A FURTHER £5 million of funding for countries hit hardest by climate change has been announced by Nicola Sturgeon at COP27.
The First Minister, who last year announced that cash for loss and damage would be doubled from £1m to £2m, held talks with representatives from the Global South at a meeting on Monday as she continued to champion the cause at the summit.
And ahead of the launch of a report which followed an international conference on the issue in Edinburgh last month, the FM brought the total commitment from the Scottish Government so far to £7m.
READ MORE: SPECIAL REPORT - How is Scotland helping the cause of 'loss and damage' and what is it?
The FM said it was crucial that the communities most impacted by climate change must be brought into discussions with richer nations about the compensation they need.
Speaking ahead of a panel discussion on loss and damage on the second day of COP27, Sturgeon said: “In virtually everything we do on loss and damage, Scotland is trying to ensure that we listen to international perspectives – especially the perspectives of the Global South.
“After all, for more than 30 years now - since the views of island states were first ignored – decisions at COP have been dominated by the voices of the Global North.”
With loss and damage now on the formal agenda at this year’s COP, the FM said it should be a “turning point” in ensuring the Global South is listened to.
At @COP27P, First Minister @NicolaSturgeon met with representatives from Global South countries.
— First Minister (@ScotGovFM) November 7, 2022
They discussed first-hand experience of #lossanddamage and how vital urgent funding and direct action is to helping mitigating the impacts. pic.twitter.com/DGQhAOMkSL
She added: “The funding Scotland has announced today is a small sum in terms of the overall scale of the loss and damage that developing countries face, but I hope that it sends an important message.
“As Denmark and Wallonia have shown, governments can act now on loss and damage if we want to. We don’t need to wait for a consensus decision at COP – we can start funding programmes straight away.
“I very much hope that we will make collective progress on loss and damage at this COP. If that doesn’t happen, I expect that more and more governments will take action on their own – my belief is that as we do, it will create a momentum for change which will feed into future COP summits.”
After the Scottish Government’s pledge at COP26, the Wallonia government pledged €1 million, $3m was pledged from philanthropies and Denmark has agreed to pay up 100 million DKK (£11.8m).
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie launches Scottish Greens case for independence in new papers
Professor Saleem Huq, director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development, said: “The Scottish Government’s leadership in this area, including this latest funding pledge, is welcome and I hope it will prove an inspiration to other countries to take action to provide funding for loss and damage with urgency at COP27.”
Elizabeth Wathuti, young Kenyan environmentalist and climate activist, said: “From devastating flooding to the prolonged droughts in Africa, frontline communities like mine are bearing the burden of a crisis they did not cause.
“Rich countries beginning to recognise the need to address loss and damage is a step in the right direction. But to deliver on their promises, real political commitment and collective effort from developed countries through a loss and damage finance facility is crucial. We need permanent, reliable and sufficient funding.”
Lang Banks, director of WWF Scotland said: “The urgent need to support countries to recover and adapt from the impacts of climate change that are already being felt has finally moved centre stage at COP27. This is an important issue that we hope to see meaningful progress in the coming days.”
It comes as a summary report was published following the Scottish Government’s conference on loss and damage last month.
Addressing Loss and Damage: Practical Action is set to highlight the funding gap for the various impacts climate change has had on the Global South, ahead of a more extensive report to follow at the end of the summit.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel