AN independent Scotland could match Finland on wellbeing and become one of the happiest countries in the world, a new paper has suggested.
The paper, published by independence think-tank The Bottom Line, says that all of the ten countries with the highest levels of average life satisfaction are small advanced economies.
Finland has been ranked top by the annual World Happiness Report, followed by Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland and the Netherlands.
The analysis notes the UK is 17th in the list and while Scotland is not ranked separately, evidence suggests it currently has similar levels of life satisfaction as the rest of the UK.
READ MORE: Independence will 'give Scotland powers to boost economy'
It says there are six variables that explain differences between countries, with the UK and Finland similar on measures of GDP per capita, social support and healthy life expectancy at birth.
On the measure of generosity, the UK does better than Finland, but The Bottom Line says there are differences in two issues which it has previously explored – the importance of agency and the need to tackle corruption.
The paper states: “There are two variables that seem to explain the gap between Finland and the UK. One is that in Finland, people are more likely to believe that they have freedom to make life choices (that, is high levels of agency) and the other is that perceptions of corruption are much greater in the UK than in Finland.
READ MORE: Scotland’s economy loses billions after slow UK recovery, report says
“For Scotland, independence will, by definition, result in greater agency and will mean that Scotland will be able to tackle and reduce corruption.
“The agency that will come with independence and the power to tackle corruption, are likely to increase life satisfaction and so an independence Scotland could achieve life satisfaction levels as high as Finland, the happiest country in the world.”
The Bottom Line initiative, which aims to add to the debate around the economics of an independent Scotland, involves David Simpson, founding director of the Fraser of Allander Institute at Strathclyde University, Graeme Blackett, previously economic adviser to the SNP Growth Commission, and former SNP MP and Treasury spokesperson Roger Mullin.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel