NEW drive-through facilities and out-of-town retail developments face being curbed in the Scottish Government’s new planning framework.
The new rules aim to promote developments which would reduce emissions and help tackle climate change.
Ministers published a revised draft of the national planning framework, called NPF4, on Tuesday.
While local authorities will still be the arbiters of planning decisions, it sets out policies against which planning applications will be measured for the next decade.
A key goal is to enable renewable electricity generation outside national parks and scenic areas. It also seeks to facilitate the creation of walking and cycling routes as well as green spaces.
READ MORE: FM urges Scots to ask if 'drive-through coffee is really an essential journey'
Local councils will be set targets for the numbers of new houses they are expected to approve.
Planning minister Tom Arthur updated MSPs on NPF4 in the Scottish Parliament.
He said: “This final version makes clear what is to be delivered and how.
“It is now clear through the weighting to be applied to different policies, that the climate and nature crises are the priority.
“That is reflected in a new policy on tackling the climate and nature crises which underpins all other policies in NPF4.”
He said the Government had listened to the renewables industry and there was now a clear expectation of the role of planning in expanding the sector.
Speaking to reporters following the minister’s statement, Scottish Government officials said certain types of development would be discouraged under the new framework.
Chief planner Fiona Simpson said this included commercial peat extraction and homes on unplanned sites.
More restrictive approaches would also be taken against out of town retail and drive-through developments, recommending a “town centre first” approach.
Farm shops, craft shops and service stations are stated as possible exemptions to this rule.
The NPF4 draft document states that some types of development would not be supported if they “undermine the character and amenity of the area or the health and wellbeing of communities”.
It suggests that drive-through developments would only be supported where they are accommodated for in local development plans.
READ MORE: Scotland pledges extra £5m for countries hardest hit by climate change
The Scottish Government has set a target of reducing the total amount of car kilometres travelled by 20% by 2030.
Gail Macgregor, Cosla’s environment spokeswoman, responded to the NPF4 document.
She said: “Analysis and scrutiny will be required to comment on the content of NPF4, due to the detail and complexity of the framework.
“Cosla has previously made clear that we support a National Planning Framework which is consistent with our existing priorities, particularly the Just Transition to a Net Zero Economy no later than 2045 and place-making to improve the wellbeing of Scotland’s communities.
“We welcome moves in the NPF4 to achieve these aims, but the framework alone is not enough and local authorities will require the resources and flexibility of full cost recovery to effectively and efficiently deliver its aims.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel