ELON Musk has rolled back on Twitter’s latest approach to verification – offering grey ticks and an "official" label to high-profile accounts – just hours after it had begun to roll out on the platform.
It comes as the platform prepares to start allowing any user to sign up for its blue-tick verification badge by signing up to the firm’s Twitter Blue subscription service and paying a monthly fee.
In response to concerns this would make it harder to identify authentic accounts on the site as Blue subscribers will not be required to verify who they are, Twitter announced it was adding a second, “official” badge to select accounts as a way of distinguishing Blue subscribers from those the platform has verified as official.
READ MORE: Anti-independence disinformation fears amid Elon Musk's blue tick plan
Some industry commentators argued the new double-verification process would only make the system more confusing.
The Twitter CEO appeared to listen to the criticism, rolling back on the move just hours after the new grey official badge had begun to appear on a number of high-profile accounts, including those for major news organisations and public figures.
In response to a post about the new official badges disappearing, Musk tweeted: “I killed it.”
He added in another tweet that Twitter will continue to do “lots of dumb things” in the coming months.
READ MORE: Top Scottish Twitter users flock to Mastodon amid Elon Musk's Twitter takeover
“Please note that Twitter will do lots of dumb things in coming months,” he said.
“We will keep what works & change what doesn’t.”
The changes to the verification system have been a central part of Elon Musk’s plans since the billionaire completed his takeover of the site last month.
Musk claims opening the verification process up to more people will help democratise Twitter and cut down on the spam and bot accounts on the site.
There have been reports that advertisers could withdraw from the site if Musk enacts some of his other controversial plans for Twitter, including allowing banned accounts such as that of Donald Trump to return.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel