NORWEGIAN state-owned energy company Equinor has announced it is postponing an investment decision on a new oil field in the Arctic.
Equinor said it is delaying any decision concerning the Wisting oil field, which would have become the largest single Norwegian oil asset approved by the Government this decade, until 2026. If given the green light the Wisting oil field would have become world’s northernmost oil field.
The Wisting oil field’s climate impact would also have been three times greater than the Cambo oil field proposed in the North Sea, which was recently paused after Shell pulled support for the project.
The decision is being treated as a victory by activists in Norway and giving hope to climate activists in Scotland, who are attempting to stop the Equinor-funded development of the Rosebank oil field located 130km off the coast of Shetland.
Difficult to describe how HUGE this is. When oil projects are planned in Norway, they are almost ALWAYS built, regardless of protests. Not now. This isn't just an investment decision, but a "holistic assessment". Means opposition has played a BIG role. Thanks for global support! https://t.co/bYsWMeh8wO
— Aled Dilwyn Fisher (@AledDilwyn) November 10, 2022
Truls Gulowsen, leader of Friends of the Earth Norway said: “This is a huge victory for everyone who cares about the climate and vulnerable nature in the Arctic.
“The time to build new oil fields has passed, and we are certain that Equinor’s reckless plans for Wisting will never be realized.
“This should be the start of Equinor moving away from destructive projects all over the world, like Rosebank in the UK and Bay du Nord in Canada, and the first step towards a just transition in Norway.”
Equinor has previously said that the Rosebank oil field would lead to an investment of £4.1 billion in the UK economy and create more than 1000 jobs.
However, campaigners claim that the climate impacts of the field would be “catastrophic” and are calling on the UK Government to abandon the project.
READ MORE: Fury as Tories HECKLE after MSP raises food bank use
Friends of the Earth Scotland oil and gas campaigner Freya Aitchison told The National: “This is a huge win for the campaigners who have been working on stopping the Wisting oil field.
"In kicking their final investment decision down the road, Equinor has caved to public pressure and is acknowledging that investing in new oil and gas extraction is not economically viable.
“The need to transition away from oil and gas will only be more urgent in 2026.”
She added: “Equinor is also trying to develop the massive Rosebank oil field in the North Sea, which would produce the same amount of climate-changing pollution as 28 low income countries combined.
“We must keep up the pressure on Equinor to stop Rosebank as well as Wisting. The science is clear that we cannot allow new oil and gas extraction if we are to stay within safe climate limits.
READ MORE: COP27 activist confronts Nicola Sturgeon over oil and gas
“People power works - last year we stopped Cambo, this year we have stopped Wisting, and now we will stop Rosebank too.”
It comes as a climate activist at the COP27 conference in Egypt confronted First Minister Nicola Sturgeon about the Rosebank oil field, which she has previously said should not be given the green light by the UK Government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here