A HOLYROOD committee debating changes to gender law has been suspended after a row broke out over claims a member of the public was ejected from the meeting for wearing a Suffragette scarf.
A meeting of the Scottish Parliament’s equalities committee on Tuesday morning was taken into private for more than 20 minutes after an MSP raised concerns that a woman in the public gallery had been removed for wearing a purple, white and green scarf.
The colours signify the early 20th century campaign for women’s right to vote and are now used by feminists opposed to changes to gender recognition law.
I tried to ask why a woman wearing scarf in suffragette colours was told to take it off or get out of parliament committee
— Russell Findlay (@RussellFindlay1) November 15, 2022
Convenor closed meeting. Security later said “political slogans” not permitted 🧐
Who decided that suffragette colours are “political”? 🟪⬜️🟩 pic.twitter.com/ufGNLciIut
Holyrood's equalities committee was meeting to discuss the Scottish Government's Gender Recognition Reform Bill, which would change the law to make it easier for trans people to change their legally recognised sex.
READ MORE: Edinburgh war memorial torched in 'disgusting' act of vandalism
Gender critical feminists are opposed to the changes because they fear it erases the difference between sex and gender and claim it would make it easier for predatory men to access single-sex spaces.
A woman had been asked to take off a scarf bearing the colours on the basis officials viewed them in breach of parliament rules banning public visitors displaying political banners.
She refused and was told she was not able to re-enter the meeting.
The Presiding Officer for the Scottish Parliament later issued an apology to the woman and said the colours were not banned.
Russell Findlay, a Conservative member of the committee raised the matter during the meeting, which was then promptly moved into private and the cameras switched off while members discussed the matter.
Findlay said: “It has been noted on social media that a member of the public who was present was wearing a scarf in the colours of purple, white and green and has been asked to either remove the scarf or leave the room.
“Can I seek some guidance?”
READ MORE: Scots have 'ethnic' problem with unemployment, says Thatcher event speaker
Joe Fitzpatrick, the chair of the committee then hurriedly said the matter would be dealt with in private.
Joanna Cherry, the SNP MP for Edinburgh South West, who is at odds with most of her party on the issue of gender recognition reform, has spoken out on the matter on social media.
She said: “It seems no rule has been broken so this woman should be readmitted or the [Scottish Parliament] could face a claim of discrimination on the grounds of belief, particularly where MSPs are permitted to wear rainbow colours. This is not my Scotland.”
Alison Johnstone, Holyrood's Presiding Officer addressed the issue later in the day and said sorry to the woman in question.
She said: "Let me make one thing crystal clear, suffrage colours are not, and never have been, banned at the Scottish Parliament.
"We actively support and promote universal suffrage in a number of ways at Holyrood and will continue to do so.
“I would like to advise the chamber that the action taken this morning was not prompted by any of the members of the committee.
“The action taken was an error, and I would like to apologise on behalf of the parliament.
"The wearing of a scarf in those colours does not, in itself, breach the visitor code of conduct.
"The Parliament wishes people to engage with the democratic process, including observing elected representatives debate and make the law of the country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel