RISHI Sunak has come under fire for “undermining the UK’s reputation” as a leader in the fight against climate change.
Leader of the LibDems in the House of Lords, Lord Newby, accused the Prime Minister of only attending COP27 “under duress” and claimed the world does not think “his heart is in it”.
Sunak originally said he was too focused on the domestic economy to attend but, after receiving criticism, later U-turned, saying: “There is no long-term prosperity without action on climate change.”
READ MORE: Scrap the House of Lords and end the UK's 'them and us' society
Lord Newby noted in the upper chamber that the Prime Minister also acknowledged that COP27 provided an opportunity for him to meet world leaders, many of them for the first time, and to discuss non-climate change-related issues such as refugees crossing the English Channel and the case of Alaa Abd El-Fattah in prison in Egypt.
He said: “Had [Sunak] not been forced by external pressures to reverse his initial intention to ignore the conference altogether, these opportunities would have all been missed.
“I hope the Prime Minister has learned the lesson that, to promote British interests internationally, he has to take every opportunity to meet his counterparts beyond sporadic bilateral visits.
“Sadly, however, the fact that the Prime Minister only went to COP27 under duress has undermined the UK’s reputation as a leader in the fight against climate change.
“The world simply doesn’t think that the Prime Minister’s heart is in it.”
The Leader of the House of Lords, Lord True, appeared to brush aside the comments, saying that Lord Newby thought a “Prime Minister in office for five minutes must be criticised because he went, at the first opportunity, to COP27”.
He added that Britain “is seen as a leader”, highlighting Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park’s initiative in nature, including in the Congo Basin, as well as the Government’s work in clean power with South Africa and Indonesia.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel