NICOLA Sturgeon has told Douglas Ross not to "rewrite history" on the UK Government's promises to build warships in Scotland.
The Scottish Tory leader told the First Minister the country would have "almost certainly" not been commissioned to build five Type 26 frigates, at a cost of £4.2 billion, if it was independent.
He lauded the UK decision that will support 1700 jobs in Govan and Scotstoun with another 2300 in the wider supply chain.
He asked if the FM would "wholeheartedly welcome this huge investment in Scottish jobs and the economy by the UK Government".
READ MORE: Chancellor Jeremy Hunt hikes taxes in Autumn Statement
Sturgeon said while she welcomed the UK Government's shipbuilding announcement for the River Clyde in Glasgow, Ross should remember what was initially promised to Scotland.
During FMQs, the FM said: "I am duty bound to note that the original proposal back in 2010 was not for five new vessels it was actually for 13 new vessels and back then it was said all of that work would be taken on the Clyde.
"So yes let's welcome it but let's not rewrite history in the process."
Earlier this week Rishi Sunak announced the construction of five more British warships which he said would strengthen UK security in the face of increased threats from Russia.
Sunak announced that defence manufacturer BAE Systems has been awarded a £4.2 billion contract to build five more Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy, on top of the three already under construction.
Ross said it was a massive boost to Scottish shipbuilding that was only possible "thanks to the United Kingdom".
"An investment of this scale in engineering and manufacturing jobs would not be possible if the SNP got their way," he told Sturgeon at First Ministers' Questions.
"If the nationalists ever managed to separate Scotland from the rest of the UK these Royal navy ships would almost certainly be built elsewhere and the highly skilled Scottish jobs lost."
Quoting economist Professor Keith Hartley, Ross said: “I don’t see a future for a Scottish warship building industry in an independent Scotland.”
But the First Minister said: “An independent Scotland, like independent countries all over the world… as a full member of Nato would have naval capabilities of its own.
“Capabilities that can and would be served and improved upon by our world class shipbuilding industry and expertise.
“The difference between me and Douglas Ross is I have confidence in our industry in all circumstances – he clearly doesn’t.”
Sturgeon added: “If Douglas Ross wants to have a debate about the benefits, or as he would see it otherwise, of independence, then I really welcome that.
"Let’s have that debate and then let’s let the people of Scotland decide the outcome in a referendum."
The FM said if Ross was confident in his argument he would seek to have the debate not only "in the safety of the parliamentary chamber but in towns and communities all over Scotland".
"If Douglas Ross was really confident in his arguments [on independence], he'd have the courage to have this debate not just in the safety of the debating chamber but out there in towns, villages and communities across Scotland." @NicolaSturgeon #FMQs pic.twitter.com/i3xFZSg5RC
— Fraser MacDonald (@fr4ser) November 17, 2022
Ross claimed the independence movement is "sinking", saying the First Minister is "up separation creek without a paddle".
He said the Scottish Government's track record on ferry-building, compared to the UK's, showed no ships would be built in an independent Scotland.
READ MORE: 'Upsetting to see strikes called Unionist plots', says trade union chief
Ross tried to draw comparisons between the shipbuilding of the UK Government and the delayed and over-budget ferries being built at the nationalised Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow.
Sturgeon told the Scottish Tory leader he should "be careful what he wishes for" because the UK warships lauded by Ross are delayed and over budget.
Responding, the First Minister said the UK Government had previously announced the first of the Type 26s would be in service by 2020 – a date which has since been pushed back to October 2028 – while also noting a further £230 million increase in the cost of the project.
“Perhaps Douglas Ross should turn some of these questions to his colleagues south of the border if he wants to come here and make a big issue of these things in this chamber,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel