THE first official body examining the case for Welsh independence is expected to issue findings on the future of the constitution within weeks.
More than 2000 responses have been submitted so far as part of the “national conversation” being held by the Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales, according to its latest progress report.
The group, which was set up by the Labour Welsh government, has been looking at all options for the constitution – such as independence, federalism and “devo-max” – since it met for the first time in November last year.
Co-chaired by Laura McAllister, professor of public policy at Cardiff University and former archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams, it has the stated aims of considering options for “fundamental reform of the constitutional structures” of the UK, as well as to “develop all progressive principal options” to strengthen democracy and deliver improvements in Wales.
Plaid Cymru said it had taken “full advantage” of the opportunity to present the case for Welsh independence.
In a statement to the Senedd last week, Welsh constitution minister Mick Antoniw, above, confirmed the group is expected to deliver its initial findings by the end of 2022.
He said: “The First Minister, the leader of Plaid Cymru and I recently met the co-chairs to discuss their work.
“They advised that they are on track to deliver their interim report by the end of this year. I will provide members again with a further update after receipt of that report.”
READ MORE: Twelve rallies organised across Scotland in response to Supreme Court
Since July, the commission has met to hear evidence on seven occasions, from a range of contributors including Welsh first minister Mark Drakeford, Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, representatives from the Welsh LibDems, Green Party and Plaid Cymru. UK minister David Lidington, who currently hold the post of Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, has also participated.
In June, McAllister said that the status quo of the Union is getting close to the point where it “simply can’t survive”.
She also highlighted how independence is one of the constitutional options being considered by the commission, with representatives from all four main political parties in Wales taking part “positively”.
She said the remit for the commission was to consider all constitutional options for Wales in the future, both within and outside the Union.
“I am not sure in any other part of the UK would you see an avowedly Unionist party like Labour supporting a terms of reference that allows an independent commission to consider clearly independence alongside federalism, confederalism, devo-max, extensions to devolution and so on,” she added.
Last month All Under One Banner Cymru (AUOB) and Yes Cymru held a march and rally for Welsh independence in Cardiff, with around 10,000 people taking part according to organisers.
Delyth Jewell, who is a Plaid Cymru Member of Senedd (MS) for South Wales East, said creating an independent Wales must be the “work of an entire nation”, rather than just one party.
She said: “The importance of the Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales cannot be understated.
“It’s the first official body – with the full support of the civil service machine, no less – to have in its remit, an examination for the case for Welsh independence.
“Plaid Cymru has taken full advantage of the opportunity to present the case for Welsh independence to the Commission.”
She added: “But this needs to be a story that develops with the input of all of the people of Wales.
“To hear that the commission has already received 2000 responses more than a month before the deadline is extremely encouraging.
“As the UK economic model proves time and time again that it is broken, discussion about constitutional reform has never been more important.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel