BLACK people face significantly greater risk of homelessness in the UK, research has suggested.
Race, ethnicity and discrimination-related factors affect homelessness risks directly, as well as indirectly through increased levels of poverty or a higher likelihood of renting rather than home ownership, researchers believe.
The increased risk remains even when other factors such as demographics, employment, poverty and housing tenure are taken into account, according to research led by Heriot-Watt University.
It said the link between discrimination and homelessness is particularly significant for black people, but also affects mixed and some other ethnic groups.
For a typical black-led household reporting discrimination, the risk of homelessness is nearly 50% above that of a typical white-led household, with two-thirds of that effect being indirect via poverty and housing conditions.
READ MORE: SNP ask members to be 'brave and visible' on Supreme Court verdict day
Researchers said they focused on exploring indirect effects following controversies around a report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities in March 2021.
This argued that geography, family influence, socio-economic background, culture and religion all impact life chances more than racism, and the commission chairman said it had found no evidence of institutional racism in the areas it examined.
Professor Glen Bramley, from the Institute of Social Policy, Housing, Equalities Research at Heriot-Watt University and report co-author, said: “Our report reveals the shocking extent of disparities in homelessness risks experienced between some minoritised ethnic communities and white people living in the UK today.
“What is particularly distressing about the findings is the apparent link between homelessness and race discrimination. This needs further investigation and we are committed to this ongoing work.”
The latest report analyses 10 sets of official data, including the census, with the support of race and equality, housing and homelessness experts and funding from the Oak Foundation.
Researchers defined homelessness in four ways – core, such as rough sleeping or sofa surfing; statutory, such as people assessed by their council as homeless or at risk of homelessness and eligible for help; hidden, such as overcrowding; and people at risk of homelessness because of, for example, financial difficulties.
It is part of a three-year programme to gather evidence to inform actions to eliminate racial discrimination, disparities and injustices in the homelessness and housing fields.
The report found “overwhelming” evidence that people from black and minoritised ethnic communities experience disproportionate levels of homelessness in the UK.
Black people are more than three times more likely than white people to experience statutory homelessness in England, it said. Almost one-third of black people with experience of homelessness said they have faced discrimination from a social or private landlord.
READ MORE: ‘Judges could say it’s too early to rule on indyref2 powers’
Black, mixed and other minoritised ethnic communities were around twice as likely to report experience of discrimination from a landlord if they also had homelessness. The researchers said this could indicate experience of discrimination increases the risk of homelessness, or that being homeless exposes people to more discrimination.
Meanwhile, Asian households were found to experience lower rates of both statutory homelessness and core forms of homelessness than black households. However, they were more likely to experience more hidden aspects, such as overcrowding or “doubling up” with other households.
The risk of homelessness was found to vary by geography and by racial group, with black and minoritised ethnic communities living in London facing substantially higher risks.
Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: “Every day we see in our services that black, Asian and minority ethnic groups are experiencing higher rates of homelessness, but this research puts beyond doubt the reality and scale of the problem.
“It is horrifying that people are being exposed to harassment and abuse in the pursuit of trying to find somewhere safe and secure to live.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel