THE boss of Scotland’s largest teaching union has blasted a pay offer aimed at averting strikes later this week as “nothing less than an abject insult” as school staff carry on preparations to walk out on Thursday.
The Scottish Government made a new offer to the EIS (Educational Institute of Scotland) and SSTA (Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association) unions on Tuesday in a bid to prevent industrial action, with the former set to strike this week.
Shirley-Anne Somerville has urged union leaders to postpone action to consider the offer.
“This is a fair offer which recognises that the cost of living crisis is the priority, with higher increases for staff on lower salaries,” the Education Secretary said on Tuesday.
READ MORE: Looming RMT strikes to have severe impact on Scotland, warns ScotRail
“This is now the fourth offer that has been made. In the same time, EIS have not changed their request for a 10% pay increase – even for those on the highest incomes.
“I have been clear that we have limited room for manoeuvre.
“The financial situation for the Scottish Government is challenging and additional money for teacher pay means reduced public services elsewhere.
“In these challenging times it is important we focus our attention on those who are most impacted by the cost of living crisis, as well as ensuring fairness to all public sector workers.
“I would urge leadership to postpone plans for industrial action and consider this new offer.”
The EIS unanimously rejected the minister's plea, with its general secretary Andrea Bradley describing the offer as “nothing less than an abject insult to Scotland’s hard-working teaching professionals”.
“Teachers overwhelmingly rejected a 5% offer more than three months ago and now, after months of prevarication and weeks of empty promises, Cosla and the Scottish Government come back with an offer that is worth that same 5% to the vast majority of teachers,” said Ms Bradley.
“This is not, as the Scottish Government claims, a progressive offer – it is a divisive offer, made on a differentiated basis, which is actually worse for many teachers in promoted posts.”
Under the proposals, teachers earning less than £40,107 will receive an increase of £1926 per year, 6.85% for those on the lowest salaries, while those earning more will receive a 5% increase and those earning more than £60,000 will receive a £3000 boost.
As well as the EIS, which rejected after a special meeting of its salaries committee, a SSTA spokesperson described it as a “very disappointing pay offer”.
“The unions have been led down the garden path by Cosla and the Scottish government and tell us they care about teachers and value their commitment over the last few years,” the spokesperson said.
“This offer will not go down well with teachers and I would expect the planned strikes to go ahead. Maybe they will listen to parents and children as they are not listening to teachers.”
When she announced the pay offer, Sommerville described it as a “fair offer which recognises that the cost-of-living crisis is the priority, with higher increases for staff on lower salaries”.
“This is now the fourth offer that has been made. In the same time, EIS have not changed their request for a 10% pay increase – even for those on the highest incomes.
“I have been clear that we have limited room for manoeuvre.
“The financial situation for the Scottish Government is challenging and additional money for teacher pay means reduced public services elsewhere.
“In these challenging times it is important we focus our attention on those who are most impacted by the cost-of-living crisis, as well as ensuring fairness to all public sector workers.”
Katie Hagmann, Cosla resources spokesperson, said the new offer is “fair, affordable and recognises that the cost-of-living crisis is the priority”.
But Bradley said it is neither “an improved, realistic, progressive or generous offer” and her members will see it as a “kick in the teeth from their employers and the Scottish Government”.
“Our programme of strike action, which will commence as scheduled on Thursday, will clearly show the strength of feeling of Scotland’s teachers who will be out in numbers and with strong voice on picket lines and at regional rallies,” she said.
The new offer, and its rejection, came after the Education Secretary told MSPs any increase in pay is “unaffordable”.
Addressing a question in Holyrood from Scottish Tory education spokesperson Stephen Kerr, Somerville said: “The UK Government made clear in the autumn statement that there is no additional support for public sector pay. Not one penny.
“So I’m afraid the 10% pay claim that is coming from the teacher unions is unaffordable to the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: 10 per cent pay rise for teachers unaffordable, Scottish minister says
“Any extra money for pay deals will have to be found elsewhere within an already contained Scottish Government budget.”
The Tory MSP told the Education Secretary: “Teachers have been let down by an SNP Government too slow to come to the table and take decisive action to resolve the pay disputes.”
He branded the Education Secretary’s earlier statement an “embarrassment to Scotland”.
Kerr said: “To have a Cabinet Secretary, in an area which is fully devolved like education, blame the UK Government… it is beyond pathetic.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel