THE SNP have challenged the UK Government to change the law restricting Scotland's right to hold a second independence referendum.
Speaking in Parliament shortly after the Supreme Court ruled Holyrood was incapable of holding indyref2 without Westminster’s consent because of the terms of the Scotland Act, Ian Blackford asked whether the law would be amended.
Failing to do so, the SNP’s Westminster leader added, would be “deliberately choosing to deny democracy”.
He asked the Scottish Secretary: “In 2014, the made it clear that – and I quote – ‘nothing in its report prevented Scotland becoming an independent country should the people of Scotland so choose’.
“If that is true, if his government is still committed to that promise, will he urgently amend the Scotland Act to ensure that the Scottish people have the right to choose our own future?
“If he fails to do that, is he deliberately choosing to deny democracy?”
Scottish Secretary Alister Jack did not address that point, instead accusing the SNP of “misleading” the country by suggesting the 2021 Scottish Parliament election delivered a pro-Yes “mandate”.
The SNP plainly do not expect the UK Government to pass changes to the Scotland Act which would provide a clearly set out route to an independence referendum – but view it as proof Westminster is deliberately blocking Scotland a say on its future.
READ MORE: Supreme Court BLOCKS Scottish independence referendum in historic ruling
Tommy Sheppard told The National after the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling on Wednesday morning that the ruling would bring about a “constitutional crisis in the British state”.
He added: “The best way of resolving it would be for [Westminster] to pass an amendment to the Scotland Act to allow the Scottish Parliament to be able to ask this question.”
Sheppard went on: “That’s not going to happen, so what happens now in Scotland, we have to assert our right to self-determination and that will start tonight at rallies the length and breadth of the country and we’ll make sure that this campaign goes on – it does not stop here.”
In a press conference called after the ruling, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the court’s ruling while disappointing for Yessers, was not a win for the Unionist side either.
She said: “That is because they will understand that this judgment raises profound and deeply uncomfortable questions about the basis and future of the United Kingdom.”
Sturgeon added: “Let’s be blunt: a so-called partnership in which one partner is denied the right to choose a different future - or even to ask itself the question —cannot be described in any way as voluntary or even a partnership at all.
“So this ruling confirms that the notion of the UK as a voluntary partnership of nations is no longer, if it ever was, a reality.
“And that exposes a situation that is quite simply unsustainable.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel