IN the hours after yesterday’s UK Supreme Court ruling found that Holyrood cannot legislate for a second independence referendum, the First Minister reaffirmed her commitment to treating the next UK General Election as a "de-facto referendum".
The idea of treating Westminster elections as votes on Scotland’s place in the Union is, of course, not a new one. It was the old-school electoral strategy of the SNP before Alex Salmond persuaded members to change the party’s policy in 2000 – precisely because the gradualist wing of the party understood that it scared particular voters off.
Since 2014, Scottish politics has settled into a new normal, in which the SNP’s pro-independence base is much larger than in the decades before the 2014 referendum. It therefore seems to make a certain amount of sense, considering a second referendum being taken off the table, for the SNP to return to their pre-Scottish Parliament electoral strategy.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon takes stage to address indy rally in Edinburgh
But does the SNP’s modern strength, and the historically high level of support for independence, make this strategy any safer than it was in the past?
The most recent public opinion polling certainly seems to suggest not.
What the polls say
In October, Savanta ComRes found that just 32% of Scots thought it was "the right thing" to treat a UK General Election as a de-facto referendum on Scottish independence. Some 55% said it was "the wrong thing to do".
More problematically, the SNP did not have the backing of many pro-independence and past SNP voters. ComRes found that 25% of those who would vote Yes in an independence referendum, and 25% of those who voted SNP in the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections, think that treating the next UK General Election as a de-facto referendum is the wrong thing to do. Nearly two-thirds of Yessers and 59% of SNP voters thought it was right.
READ MORE: There's no magic legal bullet to win, or stop, independence
Moreover, 10% of SNP voters said they would be less likely to vote for the SNP if they fight the next election as a de-facto referendum. Given the need to break 50% of the popular vote even to begin to make the case that an election grants an independence mandate, any leakage of votes could be disastrous.
On current polling, the SNP – even with the votes of other pro-independence parties, like the Scottish Greens and Alba – would likely fall short. Even if they don't, whether a pro-independence majority of votes is perceived as a mandate for independence is in doubt.
October polling by YouGov found that just 30% of Scots would support an independence declaration without a referendum if there is a pro-independence majority of the votes at the Scottish election. This rose marginally to 32% if the majority was SNP-only. In both cases, 55% were opposed.
There is no reason to think these figures would change if we were to ask about a UK General Election specifically.
The de-facto referendum may represent the SNP’s last roll of the die, but if it is, it looks like one the public opposes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel