LBC Radio host James O’Brien has slammed the UK Government’s “madness” in the wake of the Supreme Court’s indyref case ruling.
Following the Supreme Court's verdict that the Scottish Parliament does not have the competency to legislate for an independence referendum without Westminster’s consent, O’Brien gave his thoughts on Scotland’s position in the Union.
O’Brien kicked off his rant by saying “this might upset some Unionists”, before asking: “How can you justify this continuing refusal to allow the people of Scotland to have a say on their own future?”
#Scotland must be the first country in history to have economic sanctions imposed on it by its so-called union ally pic.twitter.com/o6wvZe9y7T
— Phantom Power (@PhantomPower14) November 23, 2022
He went on to dismiss arguments that the 2014 referendum was a generational vote as circumstances had been changed by Brexit since the “people of England” had “handcuffed themselves to Scotland and drove the car off a cliff”.
He continued: “If the United Kingdom is the first country in history to have voted to impose economic sanctions on itself, Scotland must be the first country in history to have had economic sanctions imposed upon it by its so-called ‘Unionist ally’ – madness.”
Following an apology for his lack of balance, O’Brien claimed that if he were a Scot, Wednesday's verdict would be “sending me loopy”.
After conceding that his opinions were largely based on his “evidence-based” dislike of the Tories, he said: “Imagine, seriously, having to look to Westminster from Scotland and to see Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and the rest of them making an absolute dog’s dinner of pretty much everything – while also being told ‘no, no, no, we’re in charge of you’”.
READ MORE: Europeans send support to Scotland after Supreme Court ruling
Several figures north of the Border have similarly voiced their frustrations with the Supreme Court’s decision, with the First Minister saying she was "disappointed" by the ruling.
However, Sturgeon has said she is now looking to convene a special party conference to decide on the details of utilising the next General Election as a de-facto referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel