THE eyes of the world were on Scotland on Wednesday as activists rallied around Scotland in response to the Supreme Court ruling a second independence referendum cannot go ahead without Westminster’s permission.
But what did the UK papers make of it?
Some left the UK's biggest constitutional story since the prorogation case off their front pages entirely, while others presented it as a humiliating defeat for the Scottish Government and the Yes movement.
Metro
Britain's best-read paper, given out for free in train stations and on buses, went with the punny headline: “Referendum indy bin”.
The Metro, owned by the same company as the right-wing Daily Mail (though it aims for a neutral stance), said a “furious” Nicola Sturgeon told the country that “democracy won’t be denied” and captioned a picture of her with the word “defeat”.
READ MORE: FMQs suspended as protester shouts from Scottish Parliament public gallery
Their story noted part of the judgment hinged on the court’s ruling that the SNP’s arguments that Scotland had a right to self determination did not cut it because Scots were not an “oppressed people” – but did not mention until later in the copy that the main thrust of Lord Reed’s ruling, which was that the proposed referendum bill was at odds with Westminster’s Scotland Act.
The i
The paper also focused on the First Minister’s reaction to the ruling, saying she was “defiant” after the Supreme Court’s “veto”.
READ MORE: What the polls say about Nicola Sturgeon's de-facto referendum plan
It also focused on what the ruling meant for the “future of the UK – and for north of the Border".
Financial Times
A small box on the side of the Financial Times’s front page trailed a piece on the ruling inside the paper, saying the ruling was a “setback” for the independence vote.
The paper also featured analysis from the top legal commentator David Allen Green, who said the ruling was “disappointing” for the Scottish Government but gave “ammunition” to the independence movement.
The Times
While the paper’s London edition featured only a trace mention of the ruling ahead of the event on Wednesday, it made the front page the day after, announcing that the court “deals a blow to Scots independence”.
READ MORE: Photos show European support for Scotland's independence after court ruling
Sturgeon will “stake her political career” on the de-facto referendum plan, which it is expected will see the Scottish Government attempt to open independence negotiations on the basis of a pro-Yes majority of votes come the next election.
Radio silence
Many of the English editions of Britain’s biggest titles did not mention the story on their front pages, including The Sun, The Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Daily Express, The Guardian and The Daily Telegraph.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel