THE BBC have upheld a complaint of "pro-SNP bias" over the broadcasting of a book by professor Devi Sridhar which discussed the UK and Scottish governments' handling of the pandemic.
Sridhar had been a public health adviser to the Scottish Government over the course of the pandemic and her book on the crisis has now fallen foul of the BBC’s impartiality standards.
Preventable: How a Pandemic Changed the World & How to Prevent the Next One had been serialised on BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in the lead-up to the Scottish local council elections – with one segment discussing the effect Dominic Cummings’s trip to Barnard Castle had done to public health.
READ MORE: How UK papers covered the Supreme Court's Scottish independence ruling
One listener subsequently complained that the broadcast had been “politically partial” towards the local elections with a pro-SNP bias.
The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit subsequently upheld the complaint following an internal investigation.
This came despite finding that the handling of the pandemic by the Scottish and UK governments had not been a “significant issue in the election campaign” and that “the proximity of the elections was not a bar to scheduling what was regarded as an evidence-based appraisal by a respected scientist”.
The reasoning behind upholding the complaint was that the material regarding Cummings’s trip to Barnard Castle had gone “somewhat beyond that description”.
The report added: "In the context of a campaign in which an invitation to compare Nicola Sturgeon with Boris Johnson was a prominent part of the SNP’s strategy, [it] could have given the impression of favouring one party over another."
It concluded: “To that extent, it fell short of the BBC’s standards of impartiality.”
The BBC has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel