THE author of a book which was the subject of a “pro-SNP bias” complaint upheld by the BBC has responded by saying that "somehow saying anything positive about Scotland is seen as bias".
Professor Devi Sridhar’s book Preventable: How a Pandemic Changed the World & How to Prevent the Next One was serialised on BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in the lead-up to the Scottish local council elections.
A complaint that the broadcast was "politically partial" towards the elections with a pro-SNP bias was upheld by the BBC.
READ MORE: All Under One Banner plan BBC HQ march in wake of indyref2 block
Responding to news the complaint had been upheld on Twitter, Sridhar said: “So… I advised Scotland and UK Cabinet Office and Kerala and US Govt and the book is about the entire (globe) and has a section with a long chapter about UK on Scotland.
So…I advised Scotland and UK Cabinet Office and Kerala and US Govt and the book is about the entire 🌍 and has a section within a long chapter about UK on Scotland. One person complained bc somehow saying anything positive about Scotland (lovely lochs!) is seen as ‘bias’. https://t.co/xQU0NuFuNp
— Prof. Devi Sridhar (@devisridhar) November 25, 2022
“One person complained bc somehow saying anything positive about Scotland (lovely lochs!) is seen as ‘bias’.”
One segment of the broadcast discussed the effect Dominic Cummings’s trip to Barnard Castle had on public health.
The report on the complaint explained that the impression of favouring one party over another could have been established “in the context of a campaign in which an invitation to compare Nicola Sturgeon with Boris Johnson was a prominent part of the SNP’s strategy”.
It concluded: "To that extent, it fell short of the BBC's standards of impartiality."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel