BANNING international students from universities is "absolutely stupid", Scotland's Deputy First Minister has said.
It emerged on Friday morning that Rishi Sunak could restrict admissions to top universities in a bid to further curb immigration numbers.
An adviser on immigration policy has warned that the bid could force universities into bankruptcy if the UK Government goes through with the policy.
John Swinney, acting finance secretary, said that the plan was "foolish" and said it would undoubtedly have an impact on universities.
He said: "These proposals on overseas students are absolutely stupid. They will set back our Universities and undermine research activity.
"Is there no end to how foolish this U.K. Government is prepared to be?"
READ MORE: Accusations of Tory 'dodgy bevvy sessions' inside Scottish Parliament
The PM's potential plan to clamp down on international students taking “low-quality” degrees could “send many universities over the edge,” particularly in poorer regions, the chair of the Government’s Migration Advisory Committee said.
Professor Brian Bell told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Most universities for most courses lose money on teaching British students and offset that loss by charging more for international students.
“If you close down the international route I’m not sure how the university continues to survive.”
These proposals on overseas students are absolutely stupid. They will set back our Universities and undermine research activity. Is there no end to how foolish this U.K. Government is prepared to be? pic.twitter.com/rMJRBZHjOq
— John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) November 25, 2022
He said that London, Cambridge, and Oxford would do well if overseas students were only allowed places at “elite” universities, asking: “But what about Newcastle, what about the north east, the north west, Scotland?”
“If you’re interested in the levelling up agenda, you might want to worry about harming universities around Britain,” the King’s College economics professor added.
Scotland welcomes around 50,000 international students each year.
He pointed out it was not just an immigration policy but also an education policy, as it could lead to a “massive increase” in British students’ fees to make up for the loss of foreign students’ payments.
The Prime Minister is considering a crackdown on international students bringing dependants and restricting admissions to top universities, Downing Street said on Thursday after net migration to the UK climbed to a record half a million.
His official spokesman insisted Sunak was “fully committed” to bringing overall immigration levels down and blamed “unprecedented and unique circumstances” for the record high.
The official said: “We’re considering all options to make sure the immigration system is delivering, and that does include looking at the issue of student dependants and low-quality degrees.”
This would be in line with proposals being explored by Home Secretary Suella Braverman, who has previously complained about foreign students “bringing in family members who can piggyback onto their student visa” and “propping up, frankly, substandard courses in inadequate institutions”.
Bell said restricting the number of family members students can bring to the UK is “certainly worth looking into”.
READ MORE: Devi Sridhar responds to 'pro-SNP' bias complaint upheld by BBC
“If you’re an undergraduate student you’re not allowed to bring a dependent but students doing Masters and PhD programmes are allowed to bring dependents and that’s gone up from – it used to be very small, about 20,000 visas a year – and it’s now up to about 70 or 80,000.
“That’s an area where the Government may want to think about whether the offer is right … particularly for one-year Masters programmes it’s perhaps less clear why we should be allowing dependents.”
Around 504,000 more people are estimated to have moved to the UK than left in the 12 months to June 2022, up sharply from 173,000 in the year to June 2021.
The estimates were compiled by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which said the jump was driven by “unique” factors including visa schemes for Ukrainians and Hong Kong citizens, and students arriving from outside the European Union.
People arriving on study visas accounted for the largest proportion of long-term immigration of non-EU nationals, at 277,000, or 39% of the total, according to the ONS.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel