A SECTION 30 order granted after a pro- independence win in a de facto referendum would “honour democracy”, the convener of the SNP ’s policy group has said.
This week the First Minister said that the SNP would push ahead with plans to run the next national election on the single issue of independence after the Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament did not have the legislative competency to hold indyfref2.
However, it is unclear whether a majority for pro-independence parties would be considered by the UK Government as a decisive vote for independence or simply a mandate to hold a second independence referendum.
However Toni Giugliano, the SNP’s policy development convener, told The Scotsman that a pro-independence majority could “start negotiations” with the UK Government and result in the granting of a Section 30 order.
READ MORE: Supreme Court ruling 'galvanised' Yes movement says Nicola Sturgeon
He said: “It’s not the only route, as the (First Minister) said. It’s not the only democratic route.
“But I think if we come out of that election and negotiations with a section 30 order, then I think that that would honour democracy in Scotland and it would put the UK in a much better light on the international stage.”
He added: “If the UK Government wants to come to the table and start negotiations on independence on the back of a (de facto referendum), then I’d be delighted.
“But I’m also a realist and I think that any advance on bringing the UK Government to a table is a win for Scotland.”
Giugliano went on to say that a single-issue election was a “tactic” to further the cause of independence.
“There are some who see the de facto referendum as ‘oh well, that will mean that we achieve independence there and then’,” he said.
“The de facto referendum in many ways is a tactic for us to be able to pursue independence, to keep it on the agenda, and to, at the very best, begin negotiations with the UK Government.
“Of course it’s risky. It should be risky. We’ve been in government for 15 years.
“The reason why we’re here is not to perpetually be in government – the reason why we’re here is to deliver independence for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel