THE SNP’S deputy leader has ruled out dissolving Holyrood and using a Scottish Parliament election as a de facto independence referendum.
Keith Brown argued that the requirements of calling a fresh election meant “we couldn’t” use a Holyrood ballot instead of a UK-wide General Election, and suggested the cost-of-living crisis would make holding a new vote inappropriate.
Brown was speaking to BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show after the Supreme Court declared that the Scottish Government needs consent from Westminster to hold a new referendum on independence.
READ MORE: Arlene Foster's daft claims show the No campaign has already begun
The UK Government has repeatedly refused to grant the required Section 30 order for the necessary transfer of powers.
The SNP plan now is to use the next election as a de facto vote on leaving the Union. The party is organising a special conference on how that would work, to be held in the new year.
But SNP MP Angus MacNeil has been among the pro-independence politicians urging the Scottish Government to dissolve Holyrood and hold a fresh election, instead of waiting until the next UK vote which could take another two years to come around.
Asked on the Sunday Show why the SNP aren’t taking that approach to prevent years of more constitutional arguments, Brown said it wasn’t the right way to do it.
“No we couldn’t,” he told the journalist, who suggested Holyrood could be dissolved as soon as tomorrow.
“You have to have a two-thirds majority in the Scottish Parliament to have a fresh election.”
The journalist suggested that the First Minister could resign to trigger a vote.
Brown replied: “Then you’d go through all sorts of other processes, by electing another First Minister. We’re in the middle of the cost-of-living crisis.”
READ MORE: Indyref2 ruling ‘very problematic’, constitution expert says
He went on: “We do want to have a referendum this year – we could do that still, if the UK Government just agreed to the proper route they’ve agreed in the past.
“That is the quick way to do it, that is the reasonable way to do it, that is the democratic way to do it.”
Brown was also challenged on why it will take several months for the party’s conference on a de facto referendum to be held.
“We’ve already said the principles which will apply, but there are more details to be worked out,” he told the BBC.
“We’re having to do this now because it’s been denied at every other route. I’m not sure why the conversation’s much more about this, it should be about the absurd denial of democracy by the UK Government. People should be challenging that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel