FORMER Scottish Greens MSP Andy Wightman has revealed that he won’t support another independence referendum until support for leaving the Union is “sustained”.
Wightman, who quit the party in 2020 over “intolerance” towards discussing trans rights and left the Parliament months later, also offered criticism of the SNP’s language around democracy in the wake of last week’s Supreme Court decision.
As the court found Holyrood requires Westminster’s consent to hold a new referendum – but the UK Government has ruled out granting the necessary Section 30 order – the First Minister argued that the debate is now about democracy.
Just last year, the Scottish electorate returned a majority of pro-independence MSPs to Holyrood.
“We should be in no doubt, as of today democracy is what is at stake,” Nicola Sturgeon said following the judgment. She vowed that her party will launch a major campaign in “defence of Scottish democracy”.
READ MORE: Indyref2 ruling ‘very problematic’, constitution expert says
Land campaigner Wightman took issue with the language in a thread on social media.
“I have never supported an indyref in 2023 and I don’t support one at all until there is sustained support for it (referendums should be about affirming popular opinion not taking a divided electorate marginally over the 50% threshold),” he wrote.
“I am thus genuinely shocked to be told by the First Minister of Scotland that I am (by implication) not part of ‘Scotland’s democracy movement’. I have been arguing for better (especially local) democracy all my adult life.”
It comes after opposition parties branded the SNP messaging on democracy “Trumpian”.
Scottish LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton has been among those comparing the FM to former US president Donald Trump.
Responding to Wightman’s posts, he again used the term. “Andy Wightman, here. Quite understandably choosing not to get on Nicola’s trump train,” the MSP wrote.
Meanwhile, Scotland’s only remaining Labour MP Ian Murray called Wightman “a voice of sense and reason”.
But independence supporters were less positive about Wightman’s argument. David Francis asked why Scotland should set an “artificially high threshold” for asking about self-determination, comparing it to Labour’s 40% rule in the 1970s.
And activist Steven Marwick asked: “So, by your reckoning are we meant to be stuck in the broken UK forever under a Tory government we didn't vote for, with a Brexit we rejected, just because a ‘divided electorate’ marginally won a No vote at the last time of asking?”
Over the last year, polls have shown Yes and No roughly neck-and-neck. Scots are less convinced that a referendum should be held in 2023.
But last week, following the Supreme Court’s decision, a Channel 4 poll found that 50% of Scots would vote SNP at the next General Election if it meant leaving the Union.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel