THE primary motive of police officers when dealing with an armed suspect is to “contain rather than restrain” unless they can justify otherwise, an inquiry has heard.
Joanne Caffrey, an expert witness on the use of force and police custody, gave evidence to the Sheku Bayoh inquiry in Edinburgh on Wednesday.
The father-of-two, 31, died after being detained by six police officers, who restrained him on the ground in Kirkcaldy, Fife on May 3 2015.
His family believe that race played a part in his death.
Pc Craig Walker and Pc Alan Paton were first on the scene following reports from members of the public that Mr Bayoh had been carrying a knife and attacking vehicles.
They have told the inquiry that when they arrived at Hayfield Road, they deployed their incapacitant sprays on the gas engineer after he failed to listen to their instructions.
Caffrey told the inquiry, led by Lord Bracadale, that the “primary focus for dealing with any kind of bladed weapon is contain rather than restrain”.
She told Angela Grahame KC, the inquiry’s senior counsel: “To put a containment, you can’t contain someone in an open place with just two.
“If four or six turned up together, you have got a really good chance of containment.”
She said containment would be the “preferred option unless it can be shown why it wasn’t”.
The inquiry heard Caffrey agreed it would have been reasonable for armed response vehicles to have been contacted, and for them not to be deployed but to have waited for feedback.
The inquiry also heard how a dog unit being on scene can affect a suspect. On the day, a dog unit had been called for.
She told the hearing about rendezvous points, and how they are used to make sure multiple units arrive at the scene.
READ MORE: Call for 'thousands' to mark end of inquiry into Sheku Bayoh's death
Caffrey said it was not reasonable for just one unit to attend, because it was an incident above the level described as “business as usual” given the reports that a knife was involved.
Circumstances were put to Caffrey through the lens of what a hypothetical “reasonable officer” would do.
She agreed a reasonable officer would only use force which was reasonable, proportionate, and the minimum necessary.
She also agreed that the least forceful option must be attempted or considered and found to be inappropriate in the circumstances before other methods are considered.
Caffrey, a former police officer, has been involved in around 150 case reports over the past five years dealing with deaths in custody, police custody procedures and use of force.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here