A cross-party group of MSPs say they have “significant concerns” about the lack of detailed costs for the planned national care service (NCS).
The plan to merge social care into a single national service is facing criticism due to a lack of clarity about the final price tag.
However, the Scottish Government is determined to press ahead with the plan, described by the First Minister as the “most significant public service reform” since the creation of the NHS.
Groups in the care sector, including trade unions, have called for the NCS plans to be paused.
READ MORE: Scottish councils to be forced to bid against private firms for care funding
Holyrood’s Finance Committee has published a report following its scrutiny of the National Care Service Bill and its associated financial memorandum.
It says fully-costed plans should be brought forward before MSPs debate the general principles of the Bill in March next year.
Committee convener Kenneth Gibson (below) said: “The Finance Committee has significant concerns over the costings in the financial memorandum (FM) to this Bill.
“The FM in its present form does not provide an overall estimate of the cost of creating a national care service.
“A large number of decisions are yet to be made and no estimate of costings has been provided for VAT liability, transfer of assets and staff, and the creation of a nationwide digital health and social care record. All of which has the potential to result in significant costs.”
He continued: “The committee appreciates the Scottish Government’s intention to co-design the service with those most closely affected.
“That work could, however, have been undertaken prior to the introduction of primary legislation.
READ MORE: Scottish care service would ‘collapse within decade’ under current plans, sector boss warns
“Major bills should not be implemented via secondary legislation, or through business cases, which cannot be subject to the same in-depth, formal scrutiny as financial memorandums to bills.
“The significant gaps highlighted throughout our report have frustrated the parliamentary scrutiny process.
“We are therefore calling for a revised financial memorandum, with detailed costings, at least two weeks before Parliament considers the Bill at Stage 1.”
On Wednesday, social care minister Kevin Stewart said the Government still intended to launch the NCS in the current session of the Scottish Parliament, which ends in 2026.
He told MSPs: “The costs in the financial memorandum largely represent investment in service improvement and terms and conditions for frontline care staff.
“Any suggestion that the figures relate exclusively to admin costs is totally false.”
He said he wanted to create a service which is “sustainable and future-proofed”.
By 2026, annual costs for provisions of the Bill are estimated to be between £240 million and £527 million.
However, auditors have warned this could understate the real costs as outdated assumptions about inflation were used.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel