MICHELLE Mone, a Tory peer in the House of Lords, is set to take a leave of absence from Westminster’s upper chamber due to her alleged links to a firm awarded millions in PPE contracts.
But what does a leave of absence from the House of Lords involve and could Baroness Mone return after the completion of an investigation into her actions?
What is a leave of absence?
According to parliamentary procedure, members who cannot regularly attend the House of Lords should obtain a “leave of absence”.
Doing so allows members to maintain their right to sit in the House of Lords despite being unable to attend.
However, this will only be granted if it is expected that the Lord will regularly attend after the temporary period of absence is over.
READ MORE: Michelle Mone to take immediate leave of absence from House of Lords
Indeed when applying for a leave of absence a Lord must state that they have a reasonable expectation of being in a position where they can return to the House in the future.
If this is not the case then the peer would be encouraged to retire permanently from sitting in the House of Lords.
Will Michelle Mone return to the House of Lords?
Taking a leave of absence means that Mone will no longer be able to attend sittings of the House, vote on any proceedings and or claim any allowance.
But since a leave of absence is only granted for temporary periods it is likely that Mone believes she will one day be in a position where she can once again attend the House of Lords.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer says he supports tagging migrants via GPS
It is likely that this would only occur if she is absolved of any wrongdoing associated with the awarding of PPE contracts to a firm which reportedly paid her £29 million in profits.
Can she be thrown out of the House of Lords?
Yes. The House of Lords (Expulsion and Suspension) Act 2015 allows for the expulsion of peers on the grounds of non-attendance, serious criminal conviction, or the breaching of the House of Lords code of conduct.
Any Lord expelled in this way is, however, still permitted to keep their title.
It was expected the legislation would be used to expel Lord Sewel, who was caught taking cocaine at a party with prostitutes.
However, Lord Sewel resigned before an investigation into his conduct could take place.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel