THE UK Government may not recognise gender recognition reforms (GRR) if they pass through Holyrood, according to reports.
A BBC government source has claimed it is “absolutely” possible that gender recognition certificates administered under proposals currently making their way through Holyrood will not be recognised by other parts of the UK.
The changes aim to shorten the time it takes to receive a gender recognition certificate, lower the age to get one from 18 to 16 and remove the requirement of a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon slams Tories over claims she 'attacked' NHS in other parts of UK
If the UK Government were to take this stance, it could make it more difficult for trans people to have their legal status recognised if they were to obtain a gender recognition certificate in Scotland and then move to another nation within the UK.
BBC journalist David Wallace Lockhart tweeted the news on Thursday evening.
EXC: UK govt may not recognise a proposed new system in Scotland to allow people to legally change their gender. They're also not ruling out a legal challenge.
— David Wallace Lockhart (@BBCDavidWL) December 8, 2022
This could could hugely complicate matters for anyone changing gender in Scotland and then moving elsewhere in UK (1/5)
He wrote: “UK govt may not recognise a proposed new system in Scotland to allow people to legally change their gender. They're also not ruling out a legal challenge.
“This could hugely complicate matters for anyone changing gender in Scotland and then moving elsewhere in UK …
“UK Gov source said 'absolutely' possible rest of UK won't recognise Scot certificates. Source said it's [a] ‘test case scenario’ of how Holyrood bill could ‘undermine Westminster competencies’.
“Scot Gov spokes said Ms Badenoch was responding to letter sent by Scot Gov in Oct ‘setting out relevant policy considerations for the UK Government, undertaking to work constructively on cross-border issues, and offering to meet’.”
Wallace Lockhart went on to say that the Scottish Government was happy to meet with UK equalities minister Kemi Badenoch over Westminster’s concerns over the proposed reforms.
The bill itself completed its second stage of scrutiny last month as MSPs worked through more than 100 amendments and will now be subject to a final debate before the Scottish Parliament's recess over the festive break.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “As the UN Special Rapporteur has set out, the Scottish Government’s proposals currently raise a number of clear concerns.
“In order to understand the potential impact of the bill on the rights of people across the United Kingdom, we will continue to monitor its progress. We have made no decision on any potential action at this time.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The UK Government’s minister for women and equalities has responded to a letter sent by the Scottish Government in October setting out relevant policy considerations for the UK Government, undertaking to work constructively on cross-border issues, and offering to meet.
“Ms Robison will be happy to meet with Ms Badenoch.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel