ALEX Salmond has kicked off an Alba Party conference this weekend with a rallying call to “choose a new future with independence or repeat the misery of the past with Westminster”.
The former first minister used the opening of the conference to set out his party’s vision for how “referendum roadblocks” can be averted.
Salmond argued that the current economic situation presented by Westminster has created a set of circumstances that can only continue to strengthen the independence argument.
He said: “People across Scotland now know more so than ever that Westminster is broken, it will continue to fail Scotland and put its own self-interest above that of the people. We have a clear choice - a new future with independence or to repeat the same old misery of the past with Westminster”
The party decided to hold the conference following the UK Supreme Court’s decision that Holyrood did not have the power to hold an independence referendum without Westminster’s permission.
Commenting, Salmond said that the Supreme Court “ruled there can’t be an independence referendum but not that there can’t be a referendum”.
He added: “The Scottish Parliament still has the power to hold lawful referenda. Then there is the SNP favoured option to turn an election into a de facto referendum but if so, a decision has to be made whether Westminster or Holyrood is tactically the right poll.
READ MORE: New fisheries deal to be worth £128m to Scotland as North Sea quotas increase
“Then there is the case for a campaign of parliamentary intervention to force the UK Government to accept Scotland’s right of self-determination or an appeal to the international courts or international opinion.
“A Scottish independence convention is a much supported ALBA policy which could unify the independence campaign and bring together the parliamentary and civic movements for independence.
“These are all possible and potentially exciting moves to take us forward. The discussions we are having about them today with invited guests and members of the public from across the independence movement will help to form that way forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel