THE first step in the SNP’s bid to amend the Scotland Act to allow Holyrood to legislate for indyref2 has been hit with an early delay after the House of Commons was suspended due to a visit from King Charles.
Stephen Flynn’s Westminster group had been due to lead an Opposition Day debate on Wednesday afternoon to bring forward a motion seeking to take over the House of Commons order paper on January 10, 2023.
The SNP would then use that time to introduce a Scotland Act 1998 (Amendment) Bill which would seek to alter what is reserved to Westminster under the act.
READ MORE: Scottish independence is 'main challenge' to monarchy's future
The debate was scheduled to begin after Tory MP Jonathan Gullis attempted to introduce a bill requiring the UK Government to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda even if the action was deemed illegal by an international court.
After Gullis’s bill was voted down, and a debate on Ukraine ultimately not moved forward, the SNP were due to take the floor.
However, deputy speaker Eleanor Laing instead announced that the House of Commons would be suspended.
“In anticipation of the imminent arrival here in the Palace of Westminster of his majesty the king, the House is now suspended until 4pm, or as soon as possible thereafter,” she told MPs.
The PARLYapp Twitter account said that the visit was "is in commemoration of the life of her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II".
The SNP debate on "Scotland's Future" is now expected to begin after the House is reconvened.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel