“WOW”. “What an argument”. “Did he not get the memo?”
Those were the responses of the disbelieving SNP MPs in Westminster on Wednesday afternoon after one Tory MP stood up and sang the praises of the Scottish Government.
Luke Evans, the Conservative MP for Bosworth, had been aiming to argue against a second independence referendum when he took everyone by surprise.
Attempting to argue that a vote for the SNP in the Holyrood elections of 2021 was not a vote for indyref2 (despite all the Tory campaign leaflets stating the contrary), Evans told MPs: “A voter in Scotland could have quite happily voted for the SNP knowing full well there’s no way of giving a referendum because there’s no mechanism to be able to do so.
“So they can support the SNP wholeheartedly, knowing full well that it was your positive record on Covid, or the NHS, or anything else like education, with independence falling down that list.”
'Did he not get the memo?': SNP MPs jeered in the Commons after one Tory MP praised the Scottish Government's 'positive record' on the NHS, Covid, and education 👇 pic.twitter.com/gtmrv31axN
— The National (@ScotNational) December 14, 2022
The Tory’s praise for the SNP’s “positive record” on things like the NHS and education came as some surprise to people who listen to his party colleagues opine on the same subjects.
“Never heard that one before,” one SNP MP could be heard to say, as other laughed and jeered.
Tommy Sheppard, the MP who had been speaking before Evans’s surprising intervention, replied: “I do appreciate the political skill of improvisation but sometimes it’s not just enough to make it up as you go along.”
“What has just been said is completely at variance with what your party said during the election,” he added.
Indeed, and completely at variance with the lengthy oration which Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross would later give on the state of maternity services in Moray. The fact it was a debate on indyref2 and democracy seemed to have been overlooked.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel