PLANS to reform gender recognition laws in Scotland have been hailed by a UN human rights expert.
Victor Madrigal-Borloz, a specialist on gender identity, has urged MSPs to pass the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill which has moved into its final scrutiny stage at Holyrood.
He said UN human rights bodies have “constantly” found legal recognition of gender identity through self-identification is the most “appropriate” way to ensure the enjoyment of human rights.
If the bill is approved – which is anticipated next week - people will not need a diagnosis of gender dysphoria to apply for a gender recognition certificate (GRC) and the time required for an applicant to live in their acquired gender will be reduced.
The age for applying for a GRC would also be lowered from 18 to 16.
It comes after a separate UN expert - special rapporteur Reem Alsalem - claimed violent men could abuse the system.
READ MORE: Greta Thunberg backs students as 'Adult Human Female' showing blocked
Madrigal-Borloz gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament on the proposals in June and in a letter published on Friday he said the legislation would bring Scotland in line with international human rights standards.
He said: “Through my work in dozens of countries I have witnessed shocking acts of violence to which they are subjected, including killings, torture, beatings, and systematic social exclusion from health, employment, housing, and education.
"United Nations human rights bodies that have spoken on the matter have constantly found that legal recognition of gender identity through self-identification is the most efficient and appropriate way to ensure the enjoyment of human rights, and I am yet to learn of a country in which this is not the case."
He also has expressed concern about "arbitrary obstacles" for legally recognising gender identity. He said such measures contravene human rights obligations, branding them "authoritarian and anti-democratic".
Madrigal-Borloz added that any efforts to water down the proposals could be a sign of prejudice against trans people.
Last week, UK Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch expressed concerns about the reforms in a letter to Nicola Sturgeon, claiming it would create “divergence” between Scotland and the rest of the UK.
It was also reported last week that the UK Government could refuse to recognise gender recognition certificates issued in Scotland and the legislation could end up before the UK Supreme Court.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel