TWO peers are facing suspension from the House of Lords after the upper chamber's sleaze watchdog found them to have broken lobbying rules.
The Lords Conduct Committee has recommended months-long suspensions for the Earl of Shrewsbury and Labour’s Baroness Goudie, with peers due to vote on the recommendations next month.
The Earl of Shrewsbury, whose full name is Charles Henry John Benedict Crofton Chetwynd Chetwynd-Talbot, was found to have broken the Lords’ code of conduct “by providing parliamentary advice and services in return for payment”.
The investigation into the hereditary peer, who was affiliated with the Conservatives until October, arose out of work as a consultant for healthcare company SpectrumX.
He approached ministers including then-health secretary Matt Hancock to promote the firm’s SpectriPOD sanitisation tunnel in return for a £3,000 monthly retainer, a report found.
He received the fee for 19 months between 2020 and 2022, netting around £57,000 in total.
The report said that he was found in “clear breach” of the code of conduct by seeking “to profit from membership of the House”.
The Lords Conduct Committee said: “We recommend that the Earl of Shrewsbury be suspended from the service of the House for a period of nine months.”
Baroness Goudie was found to have breached the code “by agreeing to provide parliamentary advice in return for payment, and that she also breached the rules on the use of the House’s facilities,” the conduct committee said.
It relates to her work for eco-friendly cremations company ecoLegacy in 2016 and 2017.
“The committee agrees with the commissioner’s recommendation that Lady Goudie be suspended from the House for a period of six months,” the committee said.
“The House will be asked to agree the reports and sanctions early in January.”
While peers cannot debate the reports or sanctions, they can vote on whether or not to approve them.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel