THE SNP have critcised plans to spend a 'colossal' £3.5 billion on an asylum system they believe is failing people from war-torn countries.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman announced on Wednesday the UK Government will spend £3.5 billion on the asylum system in a year as she confirmed plans to house migrants on disused cruise ships were being considered.
Braverman said £2.3bn of the total bill for 2022/23 will go towards paying for hotels.
She also discussed the “incredibly difficult” challenge of hitting the ambition of getting 100,000 asylum seekers into local authority accommodation – as opposed to resorting to hotels – with that figure currently at 57,000.
The SNP's Home Affairs spokesperson Alison Thewliss has slammed the amount of cash the UK is splashing on a system that "does not work".
READ MORE: Schools in many parts of Scotland to close next month due to strikes
She said: "Once again, the UK government are prepared to waste a colossal sum of taxpayers' money on a system that, quite simply, does not work.
"Instead of offering safe and legal routes to those fleeing war-torn countries or facing prosecution - or prioritising tackling the monumental backlog - both the Tories and Labour remain hell-bent on playing up to the hard-right Brexit obsessed percentage of the country.
"Only by choosing independence can Scotland create an immigration system that centres around security, protection and dignity from the minute people step foot on these shores."
Last month, Braverman admitted there were no safe and legal routes for many people to apply for asylum in the UK during a car-crash grilling.
She failed to tell a panel of MPs how an orphaned African teenager – with a sibling in the UK – would be able to apply for asylum from their home country.
READ MORE: We must put a stop to the Tories' stream of unforgiveable lies
At the Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee on Wednesday, Alistair Carmichael, home affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, also branded the asylum costs “astronomical” and warned that the “ludicrous proposals” to house asylum seekers on cruise ships will be “ineffective and incredibly expensive”.
During the session, Braverman also suggested she has yet to find a new airline to deport migrants to Rwanda.
Braverman told peers: “We have a lot of ongoing discussions with several airlines.
“We are returning people almost every week to various countries around the world. We do that through scheduled flights, we charter flights … so we’re in a variety of discussions with several airlines for lots of different destinations.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel