A POLICE officer has been awarded £44,000 after his Celtic mug was defaced with offensive graffiti about the Pope.
Police Sergeant Paul McCue was subjected to religious harassment while working for the Civil Nuclear Constabulary unit at Hunterston power station, having previously been harassed twice.
A tribunal found that Sgt McCue found a document with "UDA no surrender" written on a piece of paper on his pigeonhole in June 2020, with the same message left inside his jacket in August of that year.
In June of 2021 his Celtic mug was vandalised with the letters "FTP", understood to refer to "f*** the Pope".
Sgt McCue had begun working at Hunterston in 2007 as part of a unit dedicated to protecting nuclear sites.
A hearing was told that there had been a "history" of religious tension in the Civil Nuclear Constabulary unit, with training given to officers after allegations of sectarianism.
He first found a letter addressed to him in his pigeonhole with "UDA no surrender" written on it, though it had been some time since he'd cleared his mail and he could not put a time frame on it.
In August 2020 he discovered a letter with the same message on it inside the jacket he wore for work which had been hanging up in the male changing room.
Sgt McCue did not choose to take these incidents to an employment tribunal, instead focusing on his health having had to take a two month sick leave beause his mental health "was not great".
Having discussed a transfer he returned to work on October 10 2020, stating he felt the atmosphere had improved and that he did not expect a repeat of the incidents. An investigation by Police Scotland was closed in February the following year.
However, on June 30 2021 Sgt McCue found that his Celtic Football Club mug had been graffited with the letters 'FTP' while in the kitchen cupboard, with the wet ink suggesting it had been done relatively recently.
A hearing was told "some officers knew which mug belonged to which officer".
Sgt McCue was upset and had to return home, stating that he would raise the incident as a hate crime, with a critical incident declared.
An internal investigation concluded that one or more colleagues "who have a dislike for him based around his religion and are using bigoted/sectarian phrases or acronyms to target him knowing it will cause him distress/mental health'" and "clearly some personal animosities".
The tribunal agreed that there was not a "sectarian problem" at Hunterston, as an internal report had found, but stated that was a "semantic matter" given that Sgt McCue had been subject to religious abuse on three occasions.
It was found that the first two incidents were clearly targeted at the officer, and almost certainly by a member of staff, while in the third case it was possible the graffiti was simply targeted at a Celtic supporter, "the person responsible is more likely than not to have known whose mug it was given it was returned to the correct section".
In the matter of the first two incidents the Civil Nuclear Police Authority was found not to be liable, as "reasonable steps" had been taken following the incidents.
However, Judge David Hoey ruled Sgt McCue was harassed on grounds of religion over the mug incident as steps were not followed which could have prevented it after the previous two incidents.
The officer Sgt McCue accused of carrying out the attacks was never interviewed and 'bespoke' training was not carried out within six months.
The officer was awarded damages totalling £43,981.76 - £14,000 for injury to feelings plus interest of £1,592.55, and £26,858.63 for financial loss plus interest of £1530.58.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel