A GLOBAL propaganda expert has called out the BBC for its “horrifying” decision to have a spy boss edit its flagship Today programme on Radio 4.
Dr Emma L Briant further warned that the decision to give the head of GCHQ – Sir Jeremy Fleming – editorial control of the news broadcast “will actually support Russia” in its goal of undermining trust in Western media organisations.
Fleming leads the UK spy operation and reports directly to the Foreign Secretary, Tory MP James Cleverly.
📻 Director GCHQ Sir Jeremy Fleming is guest editor of today's edition of the @BBCr4today show.
— GCHQ (@GCHQ) December 29, 2022
Listen in on @BBCRadio4 from 06:00 or on demand via @BBCSounds. pic.twitter.com/L1gYqJStGR
Briant, a fellow of Bard College in New York, told The National: “It’s horrifying to give an intelligence agency editorial control over a BBC flagship news programme. I just find it absolutely appalling.
“It’s also an own goal I think, because GCHQ supposedly wants … to counter the disinformation that circulates about national security and things like this, but what they are doing is feeding paranoia. I think that is one of the biggest take-aways.
“It undermines the media that people need to trust in as informing the public in a trustworthy way. If they wanted to undermine the BBC’s perception of independence and cause more people to flood to conspiracy theory media then this is the way to do it.”
READ MORE: BBC called out for 'slipshod' reporting over probe into Twitter abuse of MPs
She went on to say that the BBC had given Putin "an absolute gift", adding: “I find it so insane that they would not understand the implications of what they are doing."
Briant – the author of Propaganda and Counter-terrorism: Strategies for Global Change – said that intelligence agencies often have some input on TV shows or movies, but that Fleming (below) taking on the Radio 4 editorial role was “a step beyond what has been done in the past”.
“Why is the BBC doing that?” she asked. “They have a responsibility to take care of editorial matters themselves, not hand that off to an intelligence agency.”
Asked if the broadcaster was in breach of its royal charter – which states that the “BBC must be independent in all matters … particularly as regards editorial and creative decisions” – Briant said it “would seem to be”.
The BBC’s editorial guidelines further state that it “must maintain independent editorial control over our content”, a rule which giving the spy boss control would seem to contravene.
Briant, who has written extensively on global propaganda, pointed to a story published on the BBC website on December 13 in which it was reported that MPs said they had been “severely hampered … by the failure of the UK Intelligence Community to provide responses to [Westminster’s Intelligence and Security Committee] in accordance with the deadlines set".
She suggested that with MPs already finding it hard to scrutinise the intelligence services, having a spy boss edit a flagship news show was even more inappropriate.
“The BBC, there are a lot of issues but I think it’s still a really important journalistic outlet, we just need to pressure it back,” Briant added.
“I think it can be and could be and should be an independent and impartial and important media outlet.”
A spokesperson for the Alba Party also condemned the BBC’s decision to hand Fleming an editorial role, saying that “having the head of GCHQ guest edit programmes on the BBC is fundamentally wrong on two fronts”.
“Firstly, the security of the UK isn’t served well by wannabe media chums spending GCHQ resources to prepare for a radio show, and secondly it suggests there is an unhealthy, cosy relationship between the two organisations which begs the question – is the political output independent of government, its departments, and its agencies?”
"We're a long way past that age when we were known about but not avowed"
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) December 29, 2022
Our guest editor Sir Jeremy Fleming tells @BBCNickRobinson there's a responsibility to encourage the public to understand what GCHQ does
Hear his programme highlights: https://t.co/kDwXPvEN4a#R4Today pic.twitter.com/K0GG8XQa5j
Speaking to Fleming after his editorial slot, the BBC’s Nick Robinson seemed to suggest it had been the corporation’s idea to invite the GCHQ boss on. He asked the spy chief: “What was the purpose for you of agreeing to do it?”
Fleming accepted it was a “bit odd”, but said that society is a “long way past” the time when the head of UK spy agencies would have their identities kept secret.
Explaining why he had chosen to edit the BBC Radio 4 show, the spy chief went on: “I think we have a responsibility to talk a lot about trust, to try and encourage the public to understand what we’re doing to trust in what we do.
“Ultimately what we do is very intrusive, it’s very unusual, and I think the public needs to understand not just that we do it but how we do it.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “Our guest editors are chosen for their original thinking and varied perspectives. They work closely with the Today programme team to ensure the material meets the BBC's editorial guidelines. Final decisions on what material is broadcast are made solely by the Today programme. All BBC journalism is editorially independent.
“As the first serving intelligence chief to edit the programme, listeners were given a rare insight into GCHQ operations. There were challenging questions and analysis throughout the guest edit, with the one-on-one interview further holding the intelligence agency to account.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel