NHS SCOTLAND officials have refused to release details of a controversial meeting where a “two-tier” health service to charge the wealthy was discussed, saying it was an “ideas workshop” where no formal minutes were taken.
A report that NHS leaders had talked about abandoning the founding principles of the health service sparked huge controversy when it was published by BBC Scotland in November.
The broadcaster said the discussion of the "two-tier" health service was mentioned in leaked draft minutes of a meeting of Scotland's NHS leaders in September.
It sparked headlines in newspapers that there were “secret plans” by NHS bosses to charge the wealthy and NHS Scotland could make wealthy patients pay for treatment, prompting attacks by opposition parties.
READ MORE: FMQs: Nicola Sturgeon and Anas Sarwar clash over NHS
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon subsequently dismissed the leaked document, saying the Scottish Government was "unequivocal" that it would not start charging people to access care.
In response to a Freedom of Information request from The National for full details of the meeting, the Scottish Government said it was “neither led or attended by” its officials and referred the request onto an NHS support body.
NHS National Services (NSS) Scotland has refused to release any further information on what was discussed.
It said the group that met had consisted of the chair of the NHS Scotland board chief executive group, along with medical directors, nurse directors, public health directors, finance directors, HR directors and planning directors from the different health boards.
While it normally meets every quarter, the meeting on September 21, 2022 was an extra session to “capture initial ideas that might help improve sustainability in NHS Scotland” and was for the purpose of “generating ideas”, it added.
The response went on: “A minute of the session was not taken. However, notes were captured to enable further discussion of ideas to determine if they were of value or benefit.
"As none of the ideas had been substantiated or scrutinised by any other NHS Scotland group, the document was given the appropriate security and confidentiality markings."
READ MORE: SNP blast UK Government over impact of Brexit on NHS staffing
NSS said releasing details of the meeting would cause “prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs” and “substantially inhibit the free and frank provision of advice”.
It added: “NSS believes that it is important that NHS Scotland staff can freely, frankly, and openly exchange ideas for deliberation and consideration by others to help inform policy or service improvement.
“The session was at the start of a process that would have seen ideas scrutinised and either supported or rejected by other NHS Scotland groups.
“Free, frank, and open discussion ensures that staff can raise ideas and ensures that NHS Scotland is considering and assessing all possible options for a problem or opportunity.
“Releasing all information relating to ideation workshops may mean that staff censure their ideas and may not share them due to personal concerns for how they may be presented to the public if released at such an early stage of ideation.”
The controversy sparked by the “two-tier” NHS discussion comes as concern grows over the pressures on the health service.
Dr Iain Kennedy, chairman of the British Medical Association in Scotland, warned this week there is “no way that the NHS in Scotland can survive” in its current form and renewed calls for a national conversation on the future of the service.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel