A TORY MP has been accused of spreading “nonsense” about the Covid vaccine by a senior Conservative colleague.
Andrew Bridgen, the MP for North West Leicestershire, posted the unfounded claim that the jag used to prevent the spread of coronavirus was actually a “gene therapy”.
Sharing a post which claimed “Pfizer and Moderna Have Admitted in Federal Filings That Their mRNA Injections are Gene Therapy” from a Twitter account named “The Vigilant Fox”, Bridgen wrote: “The definition of vaccine was changed to allow the mRNA treatments to be called vaccines.
“They are actually a new type of drug called Gene Therapies.”
READ MORE: Doctors outline five key steps MPs must take with NHS 'collapsing'
His post was called out as misinformation, with journalist Matthew Street writing: “This is false.
"Andrew Bridgen is now one of the sources of misinformation that his own government and the NHS are obliged to combat.
“Imagine being a doctor or nurse in his constituency who has worked through the pandemic to be faced by this.”
And Bridgen’s fellow Tory MP, Michael Fabricant, has now hit out at the “nonsense” claims about the Covid vaccine.
.mRNA Covid vaccines like those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna have saved the #UK from the mass deaths still occurring in China.
— Michael Fabricant 🇬🇧🇺🇦 (@Mike_Fabricant) January 4, 2023
“Deeply disappointed that an MP should tweet this,” Fabricant wrote, calling it “akin to the nonsense written about stem cell therapy a while back”.
“mRNA vaccines leading to bespoke treatments for previously incurable cancers and other diseases should not be held back.
“mRNA Covid vaccines like those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna have saved the #UK from the mass deaths still occurring in China,” he added.
Bridgen has frequently posted on social media about Covid conspiracy theories over recent weeks and months, even being hit with a misinformation warning by Facebook.
It seems Facebook have decided to add warnings on to my posts, presumably because I don’t fit with their narrative.
— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) December 15, 2022
Is it any surprise that they are the largest donor to the ironically named FullFact charity?
What are Facebook scared of? pic.twitter.com/GvnXfFiZKJ
Commenting at the time, the MP wrote on Twitter: “It seems Facebook have decided to add warnings on to my posts, presumably because I don’t fit with their narrative.
“Is it any surprise that they are the largest donor to the ironically named FullFact charity? What are Facebook scared of?”
Bridgen’s naming of FullFact comes after the fact-checking service posted multiple articles scrutinising his claims on the Covid vaccines.
One found: “Andrew Bridgen wrong to say Covid-19 mRNA vaccines aren’t recommended while pregnant or breastfeeding”, while another fact checked claims he made during a “Vaccines: Potential Harms” adjournment debate in the Commons on December 13.
In a separate post, FullFact found that the Covid vaccines are not “gene therapy” as Bridgen claims, writing: “The mRNA in certain vaccines, like Pfizer and Moderna, has no way of altering your DNA.”
In December, Bridgen failed in his bid to overturn his recommended five-day suspension for a "very cavalier" series of breaches of lobbying rules.
The Independent Expert Panel (IEP) dismissed his appeal "on all grounds" and told the backbencher that he could reasonably have been handed a "more severe" punishment.
The Conservative Party and UK Government have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel