NEW strike legislation set to be introduced by Rishi Sunak will reportedly allow employers to sue unions and sack workers.
The Times reports that the Prime Minister is preparing to announce legislation to enforce “minimum service levels” in six sectors, including the health service, rail, education, fire and border security.
The newspaper reports that the laws could be announced on Thursday and would require a proportion of union members to carry on working to retain a “minimum level” of service.
A government source said that strikes would be made illegal should unions refuse to provide the minimum level.
READ MORE: How Brexit has worsened bed blocking and the UK's NHS crisis
More nursing strikes are set to take place in England at the end of January while Network Rail workers are set to walk out again on Friday and Saturday.
ScotRail has already confirmed it will be running additional services following Monday and Tuesday’s industrial action.
Employers would be able to sue unions, and those who were instructed to work the minimum service requirement but refuse to do so could be sacked.
The source told the newspaper: “The legislation will remove the legal immunity for strikes where unions fail to implement a minimum level of service.
“The strikes will be illegal. Ultimately people could be fired for breach of contract.”
However, a government spokesman said that it was “not our intention to penalise individuals” and that the legislation was intended to ensure essential services were protected.
In response to the proposed legislation, shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said: "If you say that people can't take industrial action - which is what the Government is now threatening - the idea that that's going to produce outcomes and reduce delays for patients, that's just for the birds."
The newspaper also reports that trade unions are prepared to take legal action over the plans.
Tim Sharp, a senior employment rights officer at the TUC, said: “The Conservative government’s plans would be a significant curb on working people’s fundamental right to strike to defend their pay, terms and conditions.
“The measures are unworkable, counterproductive and almost certainly in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. They can expect unions to fight in this parliament and in the courts.”
The minimum level of service required for each sector would need to be agreed between unions and the government.
If no agreement is reached, it will go to arbitration and a specific level may ultimately be imposed by ministers.
Other measures under discussion include doubling the minimum notice period for industrial action from 14 days as well as reducing the six-month limit for industrial action following a successful ballot.
READ MORE: Disaster response charity recruited after Brexit lorry queue chaos
A government spokesman said: “Ministers continue to explore further measures to help minimise disruption and protect the public but no decisions have been taken.
“Any legislation we do bring forward will aim to safeguard the rights of the public to get on with their daily lives and be kept safe, while recognising the rights of workers to strike.
“It is not our intention to penalise individual members for striking and we will make this clear; this is about ensuring that the public can expect that essential services will be protected during industrial action.”
The news comes following the Prime Minister’s speech on Wednesday, where he set out five pledges setting out his Government’s priorities for the year ahead.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel