A LEADING LGBT charity has slammed reports that the UK Government is planning a “spiteful” block of Scotland’s gender reform legislation.
Stonewall have said any interference will not only impact on the UK’s international standing, but also “undermine” the relationship with the Scottish Government.
It comes after reports in the Sunday Times that claimed Rishi Sunak and his government are poised to intervene by blocking the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from being given Royal Assent rather than referring the matter to the Supreme Court, a move threatened by Scotland Secretary Alister Jack in the wake of the bill passing.
READ MORE: Union leaders will push for ‘national NHS conversation’
Meanwhile, the UK Government’s social care minister told Sky News that she had “concerns” about the legislation and refused to rule out ministers blocking the bill, adding that the final decision will be taken by the Cabinet.
The Scottish Government has said it will “vigorously” contest any challenge, as Stonewall stated that intervention from the UK would be “disastrous” for trans people in Scotland.
Colin Macfarlane, the LGBT charity’s director of nations, said in a statement that the reforms had an overwhelming mandate, cross-party support and is one of the most consulted upon in the Scottish Parliament’s history.
1/ 🚨 Statement from Nancy Kelley, Chief Executive, and Colin Macfarlane, Director of Nations at Stonewall in response to reports that the UK Government will attempt to block the implementation of Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill. (1/8)
— Stonewall (@stonewalluk) January 8, 2023
The majority of MSPs from the SNP, Scottish Greens, Scottish Labour and LibDems, and three Tory MSPs, backed the reforms in December last year, with the Tories having the most MSPs opposing the reforms.
The party also dragged the final stage debate on the legislation into a third day, much to the fury of MSPs who supported the reforms and accused the Tories of “s***housery”.
Macfarlane added: “The bill has been subject to extensive, appropriate scrutiny that has closely considered safeguards and interaction with UK-wide legislation, with almost 150 amendments debated and voted on.
“In May this year, the Scottish Parliament’s Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee undertook 10 weeks of detailed evidence hearings on the proposals, hearing from a wide range of witnesses both supporting and opposed to the reforms.
“The UK Government has had more than six years to engage constructively with the Scottish Government over the proposals.
“For the UK Government to seek to block implementation of this Act would be disastrous for trans people, who deserve far better from their government.
“It would also profoundly undermine relationships with the Scottish Government and damage the UK’s international reputation as a rights respecting nation.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf rejects calls for army to plug Scottish NHS staffing hole
Macfarlane added that it would “hamper progress” on LGBT rights and undermine Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s vow to “govern with compassion”.
He said: “The UK Government already recognises equivalent birth certificates from all EU/EEA countries, including countries which have a de-medicalised model of legal gender recognition, so to refuse to recognise Scottish certificates would be a mistake, fly in the face of international best practice, and come across as spiteful.
"We hope this is not the approach the Prime Minister wishes for the UK Government to take."
The Times reports that Scotland Secretary Alister Jack has received legal advice on how the UK can block the reforms. The National approached the Scotland Office for confirmation, but a spokesperson declined to comment.
"We do have some concerns."@mariacaulfield refuses to rule out blocking Scotland's Gender Recognition Bill in Westminster, saying it will be "discussed in cabinet".#Ridge https://t.co/ZoMhCmTrtv
— Sophy Ridge on Sunday & The Take (@RidgeOnSunday) January 8, 2023
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/640E5JhK6L
However, on Sky News, UK social care minister Maria Caulfield said that Jack and equalities minister Kemi Badenoch are “reviewing” the bill.
Asked how far the UK Government will go to stop the reforms, Caulfield told the Sophy Ridge on Sunday programme: “Well, that would be a matter for Cabinet and as you say, the Scottish Secretary and Kemi Badenoch, the equalities secretary, are looking at that and having discussions because Conservatives were the only party that voted against that legislation.
“We do have concerns but that will be a matter that will be discussed at Cabinet before the final decision is taken.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak insists he can 'get to grips' with crisis facing NHS
The Scottish Government said: “The bill as passed is within legislative competence and was backed by an overwhelming majority, with support from all parties. Any attempt to undermine the democratic will of the Scottish parliament will be vigorously contested.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: "Our concerns include the protection of single sex spaces, and the checks and balances included in the process of gaining a legal gender recognition certificate.
"We are still considering our next steps, and also the ramifications for the 2010 Equality Act and other UK wide legislation. No decision has been made on a course of action at this time."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel