IF you wondered how the British press was taking the publication of Prince Harry’s book “Spare”, then a moment spent listening to occasional Daily Mail columnist A N Wilson might give you some idea.
Admittedly, even a moment spent listening to a Mail columnist is more than the Jouker can normally endure, but this latest tirade from Wilson can’t help but catch the eye.
After reading the prince’s book – which details how he lost his virginity behind a pub, recalls taking mushrooms and cocaine, and alleges that he was physically assaulted by his brother William – Wilson concluded: “It is like reading Mein Kampf.”
READ MORE: Cocaine, virginity, and adultery: The key revelations from Prince Harry's book
While that may seem hyperbolic – who could ever accuse the British press of such a thing? – Wilson insists the two books are alike because “Hitler thinks he’s a great hero and you put the book down with absolute disgust”.
Wilson, who has penned a poorly reviewed biography about the Nazi dictator, says that people will put down Harry’s Spare with “total disgust at the self-pity, self-indulgence of this character”.
But Wilson wasn’t done there. The book, he told Times Radio, is “Diana’s revenge”.
"It is like reading Mein Kampf, in that Hitler thinks he's a great hero and you put the book down with absolute disgust. And you do put this book down with total disgust."
— Times Radio (@TimesRadio) January 10, 2023
Readers finish Harry’s book with "disgust", journalist and author A.N. Wilson tells #TimesRadio. pic.twitter.com/JhWU20wogi
“It is [Diana’s revenge] because the villain of the book is the present queen, is Camilla.
“He can’t conceal his loathing of Camilla and he puts in lots of things that I’m 95% certain are untrue, namely that Camilla was always campaigning to become the Queen of England,” he said.
“All the anecdotal evidence was that she was perfectly happy to remain Charles’s girlfriend.”
Well not ALL the anecdotal evidence. There is a book that reads just like Mein Kampf named Diana’s Revenge that alleges differently, apparently.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel