A MAN who threw an egg towards King Charles last month has said he did it because he felt the monarch’s visit to his area was in “bad taste”.
21-year-old Harry May threw an egg towards King Charles during a walkabout in Luton on December 6.
He plead guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Friday to a Section 5 public order offence relating to the incident.
The egg, which May said was not intended to hit the monarch, flew past Charles and landed on the ground nearby as members of his security ushered him away.
Prosecutor Jason Seetal said police who detained May found a soup tin in his jacket containing a second egg, which he also planned to throw.
When officers interviewed May, he said “he did this because he believed the King visiting a town like Luton, which is a deprived and poor area, was in bad taste and he wanted to make a point of this,” Seetal said.
READ MORE: Police should investigate Holyrood gender bill protest
The prosecutor told the court: “There had been a large crowd of members of the public there to greet King Charles III. As he exited a vehicle, he’s gone to greet members of the public, shaking hands and having a few brief conversations as he moved along the line.
“Within that crowd that had gone to greet him was Harry May.”
May was later confronted by a police officer who asked what he had thrown, to which he replied: “An egg.”
He sat in the dock wearing glasses and a navy jacket as his defence lawyer, Alex Benn, told the court he “deeply regrets” his actions.
Benn described May as a “committed and family-oriented person” who dedicates his time to caring for his elderly grandfather and sister.
“Mr May deeply regrets how he behaved on December 6 last year,” they said. “As his guilty plea reflects, he accepts he now has to face the consequences.
“Now 21 years old, Mr May lost his father in 2012 in tragic circumstances. That loss left an indelible mark on his life but it’s not stopped him from showing dedication and kindness to those close to him.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak REFUSES to set out Scottish independence referendum route
“He cares deeply about his local community, especially the poverty that exists in certain areas of Luton,” Mx Benn said, adding: “That is some context and some explanation.”
Footage of the incident shows Charles looking over his shoulder as close-protection officers huddle around him and guide him away.
Addressing May, chief magistrate Paul Goldspring said: “Whatever disagreement you have with somebody, the way to resolve it is not to throw projectiles at them.”
Goldspring rejected a claim from May’s mother that he “was not really aware” hurling an object in the direction of a public figure may cause them “fear”.
But he added: “She does go on, and I accept, that you expressed your regret at home.
“I also accept you weren’t trying to hit His Majesty with the egg. But you planned it and you planned to do it again otherwise why take two?
“You targeted somebody. It doesn’t matter the reasons why.”
May, of Moreton Road, South Luton, was fined £100 and ordered to pay £85 in costs.
It comes after a student who attempted to pelt King Charles with eggs during a visit to York last year had to have his bail conditions altered after a court banned him from carrying the products in public, which he claimed made it difficult for him to go grocery shopping.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel