A FORMER Tory whip has criticised the decision to suspend Andrew Bridgen after he appeared to compare the Covid-19 vaccine rollout to the Holocaust.
Adam Holloway said stripping the whip from the North West Leicestershire MP was part of a “frighteningly totalitarian, woke way of looking at the world”.
The Gravesham MP, who served as a government whip for three months during the overlap between Boris Johnson and Liz Truss’ administrations, said he did not agree with Bridgen’s views on the coronavirus vaccine.
But Holloway hit out at what he said amounted to a loss of freedom of speech by removing the Tory whip from him.
READ MORE: Who is Andrew Bridgen? The MP who lost Tory whip over vaccine claims
Bridgen caused public uproar and was widely condemned by Cabinet ministers, opposition MPs, scientists and Jewish groups after questioning the safety of vaccines and appearing to draw the Nazi genocide comparison.
He tweeted on Wednesday: “As one consultant cardiologist said to me, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.”
Chief Whip Simon Hart withdrew the Tory whip and Rishi Sunak condemned the comments at Prime Minster’s Questions, calling them “utterly unacceptable”.
Bridgen has proved unrepentant, however, releasing a video on Thursday vowing to “continue to ask” questions about the safety of the jabs.
Holloway, speaking to GB News, said Bridgen should be “allowed” to speak his views about vaccines, even if they were “completely wrong”.
He told fellow Tory MPs and presenters Esther McVey and Philip Davies: “Why can’t people have different views, even if they’re crazy views and they’re completely wrong?
“For Andrew Bridgen to lose the whip is another example of the Tory party going down this, to me, frighteningly totalitarian woke way of looking at the world.”
Asked if Bridgen’s comments were crass, Holloway said: “In this world of self-censorship, you’re probably wise never to mention the Holocaust.
“But in fact he rang me about an hour ago and he said he was actually quoting a cardiologist from I think the University of Jerusalem.”
Holloway added: “To suggest that your viewers or the public in general need to be somehow protected from views like those held by Andrew Bridgen on the vaccines is quite wrong.
“We want to do diversity and inclusion, well, let’s actually hear what people have to say, and let the public form their own judgment.
“Don’t be so sort of almost fascist and tell people what they can and can’t say.”
A spokesperson for Hart said he would not be commenting on Holloway’s remarks.
She said the statement issued on Wednesday suspending Bridgen “still stands”.
In his statement, Hart had said Bridgen “crossed a line” when appearing to compare the Holocaust to the vaccine rollout.
He also accused him of spreading misinformation that could “cause harm and cost lives”, announcing that a formal investigation would be taking place.
READ MORE: Tory MP condemns colleague's 'nonsense' claims about Covid vaccines
In a video published on YouTube on Thursday, Bridgen said his suspension “says much about the current state of our democracy, the right to free speech and the apparent suspension of the scientific method of analysis of medicines being administered to billions of people”.
He is currently suspended from the Commons after he was found to have displayed a “very cavalier” attitude to the rules in a series of lobbying breaches.
MPs agreed at the start of the week to suspend Bridgen for five sitting days from Tuesday.
He is current sitting as an independent MP following the decision to suspend the Tory whip.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel