AN SNP MP has laid out six key points he says should “underpin” the debate on independence and de facto referendums.
Stewart McDonald further said the world would be watching the decisions made by the SNP in their bid to give the Scottish people a second say on their constitutional future.
It comes after the SNP’s ruling body proposed two options for consideration at the “Special Democracy Conference” to be held in March. It will ask delegates to vote on whether the next General Election should be a de facto referendum requiring a majority of people to back the SNP – with their ballots being counted as a Yes vote – or for a second, watered down proposal.
READ MORE: SNP agree resolution text for delegates to vote on - here's their mixed reaction
This second option would see the next Westminster election fought on the issue of a mandate for indyref2, with a majority of MPs – not the majority of votes – being treated as a victory.
The National Executive Committee (NEC) said it will invite amendments or separate motions for consideration on the issue in order “to enable the fullest possible debate”.
The issue is sure to lead to fierce debate within the SNP in the coming months, culminating in a vote at the special conference in Edinburgh on March 19.
As the discussion heats up, SNP MP McDonald has set out six things which he has said must underpin the debate. These were that it is: dispassionate, realistic, flexible, generous, conscious, and internationalist.
He wrote: “This is necessarily difficult. We’re debating Scotland’s future and the decision we take in March is hugely consequential. We owe this the energy it takes to think, draft and re-draft ideas. The country deserves our most critical approach. Our party will be more resilient for it.”
With that in mind there are six things I think should underpin our debate between now and the special conference. All other ideas welcome, but here we go…
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) January 15, 2023
1️⃣ Dispassionate
2️⃣ Realistic
3️⃣ Flexible
4️⃣ Generous
5️⃣ Conscious
6️⃣ Internationalist
Explaining each of the six points he said the debate had to be “dispassionate ... meticulously considered, well-informed, and patient”. “We need to be fairly ruthless about this,” McDonald added.
He further said the debate had to be realistic and note that Westminster has the stronger hand, adding: “We should have the confidence to admit this and strategise accordingly.”
The need for flexibility in plans was stressed – “The next few years will be electorally tumultuous, with twists and turns we can’t foresee,” he wrote – adding that Yes campaigners should also be “generous to our opponents” and conscious of the perceptions of the voting public.
Finally, he said that the debate had to be “internationalist”.
McDonald wrote: “The world is watching. Every foreign embassy in the UK will have dedicated staff documenting how this debate plays out, sending DipTels [diplomatic telegrams] to their foreign ministries at home.
“We should ask ourselves what we want them to read in Paris, Berlin, Washington… “The rules-based international order – under unprecedented strain and pressure right now – is something we want Scotland to join, and we have to show that we’re ready. To demonstrate that we need to think like a state and act like a state now.”
The NEC’s motion has met with mixed reaction from the independence movement, signalling that debate is likely to get more intense as the special conference draws nearer.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel