THE UK Government is bidding for a repeat of a tribunal hearing it has already lost as the protracted battle to force the Tories to publish secret polling on the Union enters its fifth year.
Tommy Sheppard MP, the SNP’s constitution spokesperson at Westminster, said that Rishi Sunak’s government should publish the information and end the “unnecessary and expensive game of cat and mouse”.
It comes after the Westminster government was ordered by a First Tier Tribunal (FTT) to release its internal surveys on Scottish independence following a Freedom of Information request from Sheppard – which was first put in in the summer of 2019.
READ MORE: UK’s bid to conceal Union poll ‘threatens Freedom of Information Act'
The UK Government initially rejected the request, a decision which was then upheld by the Cabinet Office and the Information Commissioner. It cited Section 35 of the Freedom of Information Act, which states that information does not need to be released to the public “if it relates to … the formulation or development of government policy”.
However, an FTT, led by Judge Stephen Cragg KC sitting with two specialist members, overruled the rejection and said that the information had to be published.
The tribunal ruled that secret polling on the Union did not relate to the development of new policy, as the Government’s mind on the issue was already made up. It also said that the inherent public interest in the polling would likely mean it should be published regardless.
But the UK Government has refused to accept the decision, taking its appeal to an Upper Tribunal (UT) – after which its only recourse will be the higher courts, including the Supreme Court.
READ MORE: SLAPPs: The 'obscure' legal issue that impacts on everyone in Scotland
However, the Tories are instead trying to have the FTT hear their case for a second time, arguing the first erred in its judgment and there is more evidence to consider.
Sheppard urged the UK Government to stop wasting taxpayer money fighting to keep the polling a secret.
He told The National: “My three-year battle with the Cabinet Office over the disclosure of secret Union polling has become an unnecessary and expensive game of cat and mouse with protracted delays and appeals.
“Now, they want to kick this case further into the long grass by asking the Upper Tribunal to punt it back to the First Tier Tribunal for determination – the very court which ordered them to make the information public.
“It’s clear that, despite their big shot lawyers and unlimited access to taxpayers’ money, the UK Government are running out of options. How much more public funds must they waste during a deepening cost-of-living crisis? They should just stop digging now and publish the data without delay.”
The Cabinet Office previously insisted that the “it is in the public interest to preserve a safe space for the development of policy and the provision of advice to ministers”.
The UK Government has hired James Eadie KC, one of its most senior lawyers who previously represented the Tories in cases including the Article 50 litigation and the prorogation of parliament, to fight Sheppard’s bid to have the polls published.
The Cabinet Office has previously refused to disclose how much taxpayers’ money it has spent on its dogged refusal to release the information.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel