KEMI Badenoch has not responded to a request from a Holyrood committee to appear and explain the UK Government’s decision to block Scotland’s gender reforms from becoming law.
The Westminster Women’s and Equalities Minister was invited to attend a session of the Scottish Parliament's Equalities and Human Rights Committee on Tuesday next week, following a snub from Scottish Secretary Alister Jack.
Jack’s decision not to attend was branded an “absolute disgrace”, but said that Badenoch was the relevant minister who should answer questions from MSPs - despite the fact that he was the one who laid the Section 35 order in the House of Commons last week.
READ MORE: Independence, Brexit, the monarchy: New poll series starts TODAY
The move caused a row between the UK and Scottish Governments, with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon accusing Jack of acting like a ”governor-general” for using a little-known section of the Scotland Act for the first time in the history of devolution, to stop the bill from being given royal assent.
And now, the Equalities Committee has published its agenda for its next meeting on Tuesday, which both Jack and Badenoch had been invited to attend, with their names conspicuously absent from the witness list.
We've published our agenda for next Tuesday's meeting: https://t.co/K1MTFftb4q
— Equalities, Human Rights & Civil Justice Committee (@SP_EHRCJ) January 20, 2023
The agenda is subject to confirmation as we have not yet had a response to our invitation to the Minister for Women and Equalities, @KemiBadenoch.
The committee tweeted: "We've published our agenda for next Tuesday's meeting. The agenda is subject to confirmation as we have not yet had a response to our invitation to the Minister for Women and Equalities, @KemiBadenoch."
The committee’s chair, SNP MSP Joe Fitzpatrick, asked Badenoch to attend to provide “further clarity” on the UK Government’s decision.
In a letter to the Tory MP, Fitzpatrick said: “The committee had previously extended this invitation to the Secretary of State for Scotland, but he has said publicly that you are the responsible minister.
“The evidence session – which can be conducted virtually if needed – will be held at 9:30am on Tuesday, January 24.
“As such, I would be grateful if you could confirm your attendance by no later than 12pm on Friday, January 20.
“Once we have received confirmation of your attendance, the committee clerks will liaise with your office to provide further details about the session.”
READ MORE: UK Government BLOCKS Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill
If Badenoch had responded to the request before the deadline, Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison, who sponsored the Gender Recognition Reform Bill through the parliamentary process, would have given evidence immediately afterwards.
However, an agenda published on Friday afternoon, listed only four witnesses, and Badenoch was not one of them.
Maggie Chapman MSP, the Scottish Greens equalities spokesperson, said: "Sunak was clear that the issuing of the Section 35 order blocking Royal Assent of the Gender Recognition Reform Bill was entirely Alister Jack's decision. When Jack was asked about his decision in Westminster this week his response was pathetic. He could not answer the most basic questions.
"The very least he can do is speak to the Committee and try to explain this unprecedented decision. Suggesting that Kemi Badenoch should answer for his decision is totally inappropriate.
"What we have seen from the Tories is a total disregard for devolution and our democracy. They have cynically smeared and attacked trans people in the most reactionary way possible and used them as a political pawn in their culture war."
The Cabinet Office has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel