NICOLA Sturgeon has said she has not heard a single “persuasive or compelling” argument that Scotland’s gender reform legislation would have an impact on the Equality Act.
The First Minister reiterated the Scottish Government’s commitment to do “everything” to defend legislation designed to make it easier for people to change their legal gender.
The UK Government issued a Section 35 Order in a bid to veto the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from becoming law, citing its potential impact on projections contained in UK-wide equalities law.
Asked about the blocking of the law and its impact on equality law by the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, Sturgeon said: “I have not heard any argument about the impact on the Equality Act that I find in any way persuasive or compelling because the act does not change the legal effect of a Gender Recognition Certificate.
READ MORE: 'Debatable' Tories had right to block trans law reforms, expert says
“What the UK Government has done has just veto it, an instruction to the presiding officer that the bill can’t be sent for Royal Assent.
“So if the argument of the UK Government was that there’s an issue that needs to be decided in court, the route they have chosen to take doesn’t actually do that.
“They are exercising some kind of governor-general like power to block a democratic decision.”
The bill was backed overwhelmingly in Holyrood by MSPs from across all the political parties.
The First Minister also said that the new laws was supported by most of the major women’s organisations in Scotland.
She explained that the proposals were “exactly the same” as plans under Theresa May and added that the UK Government did not raise any concerns with the Scottish Government when the bill was being debated.
The First Minister also accused the Conservative Party of trying to “stoke a culture war” and that their actions were part of a pattern of “seeking to undermine” the Scottish Parliament.
Sturgeon continued: “The fear that women have about predatory men accessing women only spaces to abuse and attack women is very real.
“But this bill does not give a predatory man any more ability to abuse women than that predatory man already has.”
Kuenssberg then asked the First Minister about her time in the role and whether or not she would lead Scotland to independence.
“I would like to think so. I think Scotland’s going to be independent. Of course nobody would believe me if I said I’d rather it was somebody else.
“For me, who the leader is that takes Scotland to independence is less important than Scotland completing its journey to independence”, Sturgeon said.
Asked if it would be her, Sturgeon said: “Yes I do.”
READ MORE: Imperial expert says 'Britain and Britishness' are collapsing
She was then asked how much she had “left in the tank” following the resignation of Jacinda Ardern as Prime Minister of New Zealand.
Sturgeon added: “There’s plenty in the tank at the moment. If I ever reach the point, which she (Ardern) has clearly reached, where I think overall I just can’t give the job everything it deserves then I hope I have the same courage she’s had in saying ‘okay this is the point to go’ but just for the avoidance of all doubt I don’t feel anywhere near that right now. Nowhere near.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel