THE Scottish Tories have been accused of failing to follow “proper parliamentary procedure” after sharing details of an opposition day debate with lobbyists and the press before MSPs.
SNP MSP Emma Roddick raised a point of order in the Scottish Parliament ahead of two debates tabled in the name of Tory MSP Miles Briggs, on homelessness and housing.
Roddick told MSPs that she had “serious concerns” over the conduct of Tory MSPs sharing information with “landlords, lobbyists and the press” before the parliament.
READ MORE: PMQs: Westminster Tories dubbed 'parcel of rogues' amid Zahawi tax row
She claimed that Tory MSPs missed the 1pm deadline to reveal the topic of debate on Monday, and only found out when press releases from lobbyists landed in MSP's inbox a few hours later.
The Scottish Conservatives have repeatedly accused the Scottish Government of leaking parliamentary business to the press before informing MSPs. A row also erupted during the Scottish Budget announcement last year after details emerged before the ministerial statement, with John Swinney accusing the opposition of being behind it.
Speaking in Holyrood on Wednesday, Roddick told MSPs: “As you may know, members across the chamber outwith the Conservative Party did not have any official advance they have what the second of today's party business debates would be until after 1pm yesterday, late in the parliamentary working day.
"And we're only informed of the topic of the debate when a pre-prepared briefing from Scottish Lands and Estates and the Scottish Association of Landlords landed in members' inboxes at 3:40pm the day before.”
Roddick added that it appeared the Tories issued a press release to the media with details of the debate motion before it was agreed by Holyrood’s parliamentary bureau.
She added: “That the Conservative Party thought it was appropriate to communicate parliamentary business with landlords, lobbyists and the press before the parliament is a matter of concern.
“Indeed, given that the Tory MSP Stephen Kerr previously stated in this chamber that it is a matter of fundamental respect to the Scottish Parliament that businesses communicated first to the presiding officer and members, as opposed to the media or interested stakeholders.”
Roddick then called on the Scottish Tories to apologise to ensure the proper democratic progress and the “integrity of the Scottish Parliament is not further undermined”.
READ MORE: De facto referendum would see Scots vote for independence, poll finds
Deputy Presiding Officer Liam McArthur said that there was guidance for the Scottish Government and ministers, but there was no such policy for the conduct of opposition MSPs.
He said: “While guidance does determine that the government must respect the place of Parliament when making announcements, there are for formal arrangements in relation to opposition parties.”
After groans from the SNP benches, he added: “I can inform members that there was a delay on one of the motions being circulated while issues of admissibility were being considered.
“However, as a matter of courtesy and respect it would have been preferable had the details of these debates not appeared in the public domain before the wider parliament was informed of these topics.”
A spokesperson for the Scottish Tories told The National: "The trail press release on our party business did not refer to the specifics of either motion, just the general themes of the two debates, so there is nothing to apologise for."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel