KEIR Starmer has signalled that he will take direct control over Scottish Labour’s position on gender reform as it has become a “UK-wide issue”.
Speaking to the Spectator, the Labour leader was asked if he had spoken to Anas Sarwar – the leader of the party at Holyrood – about the decision to whip his MSPs to back the Gender Reform Recognition Bill.
Starmer said their “offices did”, going on: “Subsequently it has now become a UK-wide issue, not just a Scottish parliament issue.
“So it’s for the Labour party, under my leadership, to take the key decisions as we go forward from there.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour embroiled in civil war over blocking of gender reform bill
The UK leader’s comments will do little to quell dissatisfaction in the Labour party about its handling of the gender reform process.
Monica Lennon, the MSP who ran against Sarwar for the Scottish Labour leadership, accused Starmer of having “undermined” his colleagues north of the Border through his stance on the GRR bill.
After Scottish Secretary Alister Jack announced he would use Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block the bill’s passing, the UK Labour party attempted to take the middle ground, claiming that both the UK and Scottish Governments were at fault.
Labour’s shadow Scottish secretary and sole Scottish MP, Ian Murray, claimed that there was not “any drive to try and find solutions apart from throwing constitutional bricks at each other”, and called for “real cooperation from both of Scotland's governments”.
However, speaking to BBC Radio Scotland, Lennon said that Murray's view was "disingenuous" and did not reflect those of the Scottish Labour MSP group.
"I think to get into making this about 'Oh it's two governments, why can't they just along?' … I think that's really disingenuous to frame it in that way.
"So, I take my cue from the position of Scottish Labour, how we voted in December, how we've conducted ourselves throughout the scrutiny of the legislation, and the work led by my Scottish Labour colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy who leads for us on equalities.”
After the Section 35 announcement, Sarwar was silent for two days. When he did speak up, he said that Murray had spoken for the party as shadow secretary for Scotland.
Sarwar further called for a “grown-up approach”, but did say that the use of Section 35 was “wrong”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel