ANTI-STRIKE laws passed by a comfortable margin in the Commons on Monday night – with the Government accused of “playing politics with key workers’ lives”.
The bill is likely to face legal challenges, warned former business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg, who voted for the new law despite his misgivings.
Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner branded the legislation the “Conservative sacking nurses bill” and said Labour would repeal it if the party was elected to power.
She said: “It threatens key workers with the sack during a workers shortage and crisis, mounts an outright assault on the fundamental freedom of working people, while doing absolutely nothing to resolve the crisis at hand.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak faces fresh crisis as two top Tories dragged into row over tax
“Let’s look at what this is really all about: a Government that is playing politics with key workers’ lives because they can’t stomach negotiation, a Government that is lashing out at working people instead of dealing with its 13 years of failure, and a Government and Prime Minister dangerously out of his depth and running scared of scrutiny.”
Meanwhile the SNP’s Alan Brown failed to get his amendment, which would have given Holyrood a veto on the legislation, over the line.
He said: “We know the attitude of the UK Government is ‘Westminster knows best’, even though it’s Westminster itself that’s wrecking inter-government relations and it’s Westminster that’s looking to wreck relationships with key workers, and key workers in devolved nations as well.”
Business Secretary Grant Shapps defended the legislation in a short speech at the end of the debate, saying the government was “simply proposing to protect people’s lives and to protect people’s livelihoods” by limiting strike action.
How did Scottish Tory MPs vote?
For
- Alister Jack
- John Lamont
- David Mundell
No vote
- Andrew Bowie
- David Duguid
- Douglas Ross
Scotland's SNP, LibDem and Labour MPs voted against the bill.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel