THE Deputy First Minister has said it would be “premature” to say if he supports the idea of a General Election being used as a “de facto” independence referendum ahead of the SNP’s special democracy conference.
The party is to hold a meeting of delegates on March 19 to debate the way forward after the Supreme Court ruled Holyrood could not legislate for indyref2 without Westminster consent.
The party’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) has proposed two options. The first would see the next General Election treated as a “de facto” independence referendum, while the second would see that same election instead used to try and win a mandate for a repeat of the 2014 vote.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon lays out details of SNP special conference – read it in full
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has urged SNP members and branches to submit their own proposals or amendments to the NEC’s ahead of the special democracy conference in order to facilitate open and rigorous debate.
Asked what his preferred route would be, Swinney said he wanted to see a referendum held with the consent of Westminster, but declined to say what he supported beyond that.
The Deputy First Minister told The National: “My preference is that we have a Section 30 order that enables a legally competent referendum to take its course, for which there’s a parliamentary majority. That's my preference.
“In relation to the party debate, I think it's important, I very much agree with the First Minister, I think it's important the party has its say in these questions. I don't know all the questions that will be in front of the party conference, so I think it's a bit premature to set out what my thinking is.
“We'll wait and see the full range of proposals that are before the conference, and I'll consider that at that time.
“But I think it's important that we leave as much space at this critical moment for the party members to decide what way they want to go.”
Asked if he was fully behind the First Minister in supporting the idea of using a Westminster election as a de facto referendum, Swinney said: “The First Minister said she wants the party to take a decision and that's her position and that's my position.
“I think it's important the party's got the space to think about this to consider it and we'll all come to our conclusion,” he added.
Alison Thewliss (above), the SNP’s home affairs spokesperson at Westminster, told The National she would back a de facto referendum if that was the party’s decision at conference.
Asked for her position on the issue, Thewliss said: “I can see all sides of this debate. There's advantages and disadvantages regardless of how you want to do this.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry says she won't be leaving SNP following Alyn Smith remark
“But I'm most keen that we get a proper referendum and that the UK Government gives us the referendum that we have a mandate for, because that will be a gold standard.”
Asked if she would “100% back a de facto referendum” if the special democracy conference decided that was the best way forward, Thewliss said: “Yes. I mean, the position of the Westminster election, as the next election, makes sense to me, because that's the next thing that's coming – rather than having to wait for a Scottish Parliament election.”
“It seems perfectly logical,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel