BORIS Johnson has claimed that “Brexit helped save lives” during an interview with Nadine Dorries.
The shamed former prime minister was interviewed on the ex-culture secretary’s TalkTV show and hailed the pace of Britain’s vaccine roll-out, which he said was speedier because the UK had left the EU.
He admitted he thought people’s “eyes [would] bulge a bit” at the statement – but insisted it was “true”.
Boris Johnson reveals how the Tories will beat "Crasheroonie-snoozefest Keir Starmer" at the next election.
— TalkTV (@TalkTV) February 1, 2023
Don't miss his exclusive interview with Nadine Dorries this Friday at 8pm on TalkTV. pic.twitter.com/s0PyNInNLr
Speaking on the show, Johnson said: “Had it not been for the fact that we were able to do our own regulation, had it not been for the fact that we’d come out of the European Medicines Agency, the MHRA [the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency]… was now totally free to decide how to, how fast to approve a vaccine.
“We wouldn’t have been able to do that vaccine roll-out so fast and it is literally true that Brexit helped save lives and you know, people’s eyes bulge a bit when you say that but it happens to be true…I’m proud of that and all the work that those people did.”
However, Johnson’s claim that the UK’s exit from the EU allowed the government to approve vaccines quicker has been shown to be false.
Since 2012 the MHRA has been permitted to approve unlicenced medicinal products in the case of public emergencies such as pandemics.
READ MORE: John Swinney won't commit to de facto independence referendum plan
When the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was approved in the UK in December 2020 it was done so under existing EU legislation.
The comments come after hundreds of Scots gathered outside the Scottish Parliament on Tuesday evening to mark the third anniversary of Brexit.
SNP MP Alyn Smith told the crowd: “There’s no way you can polish this jobbie. The answer is independence!”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel