TRANS woman India Willoughby has said she felt like she was at her own “hanging” during her appearance on Thursday night’s Question Time.
The UK’s first transgender news presenter appeared on the programme alongside SNP minister Jenny Gilruth, Tory minister John Lamont, Labour MP Ian Murray, and Spiked journalist Ella Whelan.
During the show, Willoughby clashed with a member of the audience as they discussed the recent debate around trans prisoners.
A woman in the audience said that “you can’t change sex” which was met with some clapping.
The audience member suggested that trans women who have lived as women for many years and had full surgery should not be allowed in single-sex spaces.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar has 'gall' to say he stands with workers, SNP MP says
She added: “You can live your life how you like and I wish you no harm but you can’t biologically change sex.”
Willoughby responded that all she had done was “align my body” with how she feels. The audience member then asked “why society has to change”, to which Willoughby responded: “Because we’re a civilised society.”
Willoughby said she could have heard the conversation “in the 1970s about black people”, which Whelan labelled a “cheap shot” and “outrageous allegation”.
During the show, Tory MP Lamont said the UK Government “did not feel the necessary safeguards” were in place to prevent trans women from entering female prisons, which was again met by some clapping.
Scotland’s transport minister Jenny Gilruth meanwhile said that it is “predatory men” that are a threat to women rather than trans women themselves.
She encouraged people to be “mindful” of their language.
This woman in the audience speaking to India Willoughby like she’s stuck in the 1970’s
— kerry ✊💙💙 (backing Nurses) (@hewitson10) February 2, 2023
‘You can’t change sex’
‘Why does society have to change when there’s not many trans around?’
Unbelievable how sad people are@IndiaWilloughby , we’ll handled 👏#bbcqt #QuestionTime pic.twitter.com/UL5y4MTYml
Writing on social media after the show, Willoughby said: “Horrible. I think GCs [gender critical people] must have block-booked the audience.”
Another tweet read: “Lynch mob. Felt like I was at a hanging! Mine! Trans people are amazing (I know – biased) and it was disappointing to feel that mood in the air. 1970s audience bar a few exceptions! Did my best – love you all.”
She also said that “trans people have nothing to be ashamed of or be embarrassed about” but that it was “deeply sad” how a “Frankenstein mob mentality” persists.
During the show, Willoughby said that the “toxic” debate over transgender issues is being driven by “a lot of misinformation by a media that is completely transphobic”.
Many took to social media to defend Willoughby and echo her thoughts on the programme.
One user said they were “shocked and embarrassed” at what they had seen while another described it as “very depressing” and as though “the last 40 years didn’t happen”.
I know. It was like being in an episode of Life On Mars. But it’s backfired looking at the reaction from those watching at home. Just so sad this happens in 2023 #BBCQT https://t.co/iM62QM0oUy
— India Willoughby (@IndiaWilloughby) February 3, 2023
They did add however that Willoughby had done a “great job” but that she should not need to “justify her very existence on national TV”.
Another said that some of the comments were “outright discrimination and hate”. Somebody else explained that they were a mother of a transwoman and that the show was “very hard to watch and listen”.
Willoughby replied: “I know. It was like being in an episode of Life On Mars. But it’s backfired looking at the reaction from those watching at home. Just so sad this happens in 2023.”
She also responded to another tweet which said they didn’t see any politician look to defend Willoughby.
She re-tweeted it with the caption: “Hello @UKLabour @Keir_Starmer is anyone there?”
The Labour leader has previously said he has “concerns” about the Scottish Parliament's Gender Recognition Reform Bill and has signalled that he will take direct control over Scottish Labour’s position.
MSP Monica Lennon previously said she was “very disappointed” with Starmer’s position given the legislation was passed by an overwhelming majority of MSPs.
Gilruth and Whelan also clashed on the subject of Isla Bryson, the trans person who was found guilty of raping two women.
Whelan asked the SNP minister whether the “individual” was a “man or a woman”.
She replied: “This individual is a rapist. The First Minister was asked this question today at First Minister’s Questions.
READ MORE: Transgender prisoners: What are the facts in UK jails?
“She gave the response that she didn’t know enough about the individual in question. I would say likewise.
“But I think the most important thing in this case, we have to be very careful because we trust the Scottish Prison Service on behalf of Scottish ministers. That is their role. That is their job.”
Gilruth added that two reviews were underway while Whelan continually told her that she had not answered the question.
The MSP added: “This individual is a rapist. That is the most important thing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel